Skip to main content
3 of 5
deleted 35 characters in body
draks ...
  • 457
  • 4
  • 19

How does the topology of the graphs' Riemann surface relate to its knot representation?

Let me give a worked-out example: The following cubic planar non-simple graph

$\hskip2.3in$enter image description here

has the adjacency matrix $A=\pmatrix{0&3\\3&0}$. The reciprocal of Ihara's $\zeta$ function can be evaluated $$ \frac{1}{\zeta_G(u)}={(1-u^2)^{2-1}\det(I - Au + 2u^2I)}\\ ={(1-u^2) (4u^4-5u^2+1)} $$

Looking at the orientation of the edges around the vertices, it is obvious that left and right are oriented opposite.

Now blow up every edge like in a ribbon or fat graph. Including the change of orientation the resulting graph looks like:

$\hskip1.7in$enter image description here

where I stuck to the convention that I flipped every fat graph edge in the same direction. The resulting knot is a trefoil.

Further, the bicubic planar graphs can be related to Riemann surfaces (see here and references therein). Is there a relation between the Riemann surfaces and the knot?

How does the topology of the graphs' Riemann surface relate to its knot representation?

Concerning the construction of Riemann Surfaces, I can't judge which is the most promising. I collected a bunch of constructions (any additional ones are welcome here):

but I can't judge which one fits best to knots. If I'm forced to pick, I'll pick Hurwitz.

Any help is appreciated...

draks ...
  • 457
  • 4
  • 19