Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
9 votes
1 answer
178 views

Morphisms of hammocks in the simplicial localization

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category together with a wide subcategory $\mathcal{W} \subset \mathcal{C}$. In Calculating Simplicial Localizations by Dwyer and Kan, a morphism of hammocks is defined to ...
F.Abellan's user avatar
  • 457
8 votes
1 answer
860 views

Is hammock localization a localization in the sense of Lurie?

In a series of papers ([1], [2] and [3]), Dwyer and Kan introduced the hammock localization [2] as an effective technique to compute the simplicial localization of a model category [1]. This is meant ...
Andrea Marino's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
235 views

Hammock localization and free adjoints

The Hammock localization $L^H \mathcal{C}$ of a relative category $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal {W})$ is a simplicial category defined by Dwyer and Kan as a way to compute the $\infty$-categorical ...
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 42.4k
4 votes
0 answers
95 views

A variation of the hammock localization

Let $W \subseteq \mathcal{C}$ be a wide subcategory of a category $\mathcal{C}$. The saturation $\overline{W}$ of $W$ is the class of maps of $\mathcal{C}$ which become isomorphisms in $\mathcal{C}[W^{...
Valery Isaev's user avatar
  • 4,459
2 votes
1 answer
171 views

Are hammock localizations locally truncated?

Let us take a relative category $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{W})$, and consider its hammock localization $L_H \mathcal{C}$. It seems to me that for every two objects $X,Y \in \mathcal{C}$ the mapping ...
Giulio Lo Monaco's user avatar