All Questions
10 questions
63
votes
4
answers
7k
views
When size matters in category theory for the working mathematician
I think a related question might be this (Set-Theoretic Issues/Categories).
There are many ways in which you can avoid set theoretical paradoxes in dealing with category theory (see for instance ...
- 9,111
5
votes
2
answers
629
views
Applications of ZFA-Set Theory
The set theory with atoms (ZFA), is a modified version of set theory, and is characterized by the fact that it admits objects other than sets, atoms. Atoms are objects which do not have any elements.
...
- 73.2k
157
votes
5
answers
28k
views
What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?
In his talk, The Future of Mathematics, Dr. Kevin Buzzard states that Lean is the only existing proof assistant suitable for formalizing all of math. In the Q&A part of the talk (at 1:00:00) he ...
- 48.8k
6
votes
1
answer
994
views
Which branches of mathematics can be done just in terms of morphisms and composition?
Consider the first-order language $L_{\omega\omega}$ of the signature $L:=\{\mathrm{dom}, \mathrm{cod}, \mathrm{comp}\}$, where $\mathrm{dom}$ and $\mathrm{cod}$ are unary function symbols and $\...
CommunityBot
- 1
50
votes
4
answers
6k
views
Do set-theorists use informal set theory as their meta-theory when talking about models of ZFC?
Here, Noah Schweber writes the following:
Most mathematics is not done in ZFC. Most mathematics, in fact, isn't done axiomatically at all: rather, we simply use propositions which seem "intuitively ...
- 403
8
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Does equality between sets contradict the philosophy behind structural set theory?
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (with choice) is commonly accepted as the standard foundation of mathematics. It is a material set theory. This means that for every two objects/sets $a,b$ one can ask ...
- 2,754
19
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Which kind of foundation are mathematicians using when proving metatheorems?
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (with choice) is commonly accepted as the standard foundation of mathematics. It is a material set theory. For every two objects/sets $a,b$ one can ask whether $a=b$ or not....
- 42.8k
1
vote
0
answers
223
views
What should one know about abstract sets and structural foundations?
Recently I came by accident across the book sets for mathematics by Lawvere. It says:
First we deplete the object of nearly all content. We could think of an idealized
computer memory bank that ...
0
votes
1
answer
678
views
Why do we try to encode every mathematical object as a set? [closed]
Probably everyone of us has seen set-theoretic encodings of mathematical objects which we wouldn't naturally consider to be sets. May it be the "definition" of a function from $A$ to $B$ as a relation ...
CommunityBot
- 1
6
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Why can't mathematics be formalised in terms of classes rather than sets? [closed]
I've always been curious about the seeming compulsion to found mathematics upon sets, be it ZF(C) or some other system. Of course, there are other approaches these days like category theory and type ...
- 42.8k