Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
8 votes
1 answer
466 views

Tensor product of sites

Let $C, D$ two Grothendieck sites. Since the corresponding toposes $E, F$ are locally presentable categories, then (by Gabriel-Ulmer duality) they correspond to limit theories $X, Y$ (that is, small ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
478 views

From Topoi to Grothendieck categories

This question is mostly about a reference request. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a Grothendieck topos. I am looking for a reference of the following two facts. I am aware that $(2) \Rightarrow (1)$ by Gabriel-...
Ivan Di Liberti's user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
584 views

When is the category of models of a limit theory a topos?

If $\mathcal{E}$ is a Grothendieck topos on a small base, then it is locally presentable, and hence is equivalent to the category of models of some limit theory. Is there a characterization of ...
Jonathan Gallagher's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
470 views

A locally presentable locally cartesian closed category that is not a quasitopos

This question asks for a locally presentable locally cartesian closed category that is not a topos. All the answers given (at least in the 1-categorical case) are quasitoposes. What is an example of ...
Mike Shulman's user avatar
  • 66.8k
7 votes
1 answer
452 views

Example of a locally presentable locally cartesian closed category which is not a topos?

The only way I know to get a locally cartesian closed category which is not a topos is to start with a topos and then throw out some objects so that the category is not sufficiently cocomplete to be a ...
Tim Campion's user avatar