Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
67 votes
10 answers
14k views

Arguments against large cardinals

I started to learn about large cardinals a while ago, and I read that the existence, and even the consistency of the existence of an inaccessible cardinal, i.e. a limit cardinal which is additionally ...
user8996's user avatar
  • 825
26 votes
7 answers
6k views

What "forces" us to accept large cardinal axioms?

Large cardinal axioms are not provable using usual mathematical tools (developed in $\text{ZFC}$). Their non-existence is consistent with axioms of usual mathematics. It is provable that some of ...
user avatar
53 votes
2 answers
3k views

Silver's approach to the inconsistency of $\mathrm{ZFC}$

As all probably know, Jack Silver passed away about one month ago. The announcement released, with delay, by European Set Theory Society includes a quote by Solovay about his belief on inconsistency ...
Rahman. M's user avatar
  • 2,381
31 votes
3 answers
5k views

Should there be a true model of set theory?

As I understand it, there is a program in set theory to produce an ultimate, canonical model of set theory which, among other things, positively answers the Continuum Hypothesis and various questions ...
Amit Kumar Gupta's user avatar
21 votes
2 answers
2k views

Philosophical arguments in defense (or against) large cardinals

The question is essentially what is asked in the title. I split it into two parts (A) (Arguments supporting the existence of large cardinals) What are the main philosophical arguments in defense of ...
7 votes
9 answers
7k views

Ultrainfinitism, or a step beyond the transfinite

Cantor has, in the immortal words of D. Hilbert, given all of us a paradise (or perhaps, I would rather say, a great vacation spot), the TRANSFINITE. $\aleph_0, \aleph_1,\aleph_2\dots$ the lists ...
Mirco A. Mannucci's user avatar