All Questions
9 questions
4
votes
0
answers
95
views
$\omega$ incompleteness of $\lambda$ calculus
In Plotkin's 'The $\lambda$-Calculus is $\omega$-Incomplete' (The Journal of Symbolic Logic Vol. 39, No. 2 (Jun., 1974), pp. 313-317), an example is given of two (untyped) $\lambda$-terms $M$ and $N$ ...
3
votes
0
answers
264
views
Upward confluence in the interaction calculus
The lambda calculus is not upward confluent, counterexamples being known for a long time. Now, what about the interaction calculus? Specifically, I am looking for configurations $c_1$ and $c_2$ such ...
16
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Why is there no product type in simply typed lambda-calculus?
$\DeclareMathOperator\Pair{Pair}\DeclareMathOperator\First{First}\DeclareMathOperator\Second{Second}\DeclareMathOperator\Left{Left}\DeclareMathOperator\Right{Right}\DeclareMathOperator\Choice{Choice}$...
3
votes
1
answer
404
views
Is there an easy decision algorithm for the inhabitation problem for simple types?
Consider the basic system of simple types usually known as $TA_\lambda$. One can prove that (as a consequence of the Subject Reduction Property and the fact that any typable term is strongly $\beta$-...
1
vote
1
answer
169
views
Interaction-based approximation for HP-complete λ-theory?
We are looking for a proof or counter-examples for the following hypothesis.
Two combinators $M$ and $N$ are solvable and equivalent in the HP-complete sensible $\lambda$-theory iff either
$$
\exists ...
1
vote
1
answer
223
views
Hypothesis: interaction-based model for λKβη
We are looking for a proof or counter-examples to the following
Hypothesis. In interaction calculus $\langle \varnothing\ |\ \Gamma(M, x) \cup \Gamma(N, x)\rangle \downarrow \langle \varnothing\ |\ ...
3
votes
0
answers
266
views
Is it possible to implement η-reduction in interaction nets?
There are several ways to encode λ-terms in interaction nets; for instance, using the original optimal algorithm by Lamping, or compiling λ-calculus into interaction combinators. However, all the ...
7
votes
1
answer
531
views
Are innermost reductions perpetual in untyped $\lambda$-calculus?
Background
In the untyped lambda calculus, a term may contain many redexes, and
different choices about which one to reduce may produce wildly
different results (e.g. $(\lambda x.y)((\lambda x.xx)\...
17
votes
3
answers
3k
views
What is the history of the Y-combinator?
Inspired by the comments to this question, I wonder if someone can explain the history of the fixed point combinator (often called the Y combinator) in lambda calculus.
Where did it first appear? ...