All Questions
1 question
4
votes
1
answer
561
views
Why should it be hard to generalize Dvir's proof of the finite field Kakeya conjecture to the Euclidean case?
Let $q$ be prime and let
$q\delta \sim 1.$ Let $K$ be any set of $C_n\delta$-separated tubes in $B(0,2)$, where $C_n$ is some constant depending on $n$. Let us consider a grid of $q^n$ points scaled ...