Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
0 answers
237 views

Where can I find information about this concept of 'dual ideals'?

I have come across the following notion of (what I am calling) dual ideals, and I am looking for any work in which this notion has been considered, and particularly anything about transferring ...
Calliope Ryan-Smith's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
120 views

$\mathtt{PSP}$ holding only for sets of cardinality $\mathfrak{c}$

Consider the sentence $\mathtt{PSP}_\mathfrak{c}$: "Every subset of $\mathbb{R}$ having the cardinality of the continuum contains a Cantor set". A priori this sentence is weaker than the ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,286
3 votes
0 answers
78 views

Forcings that preserve $\mathtt{PSP}$

By $\mathtt{PSP}$ I mean the statement "every subset of the reals has the perfect set property, i.e. either is countable or it contains an homeomorphic copy of the Cantor space $2^\omega$". ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,286
3 votes
0 answers
236 views

Borel equivalence relations on Ellentuck cubes

Is there a Borel equivalence relation $E$ on $[\omega]^\omega$ such that $E \not \leq_B E_0$ and for any $a \in [\omega]^\omega$ we have that $E \upharpoonright [a]^\omega$ is Borel bireducible with $...
daljnovod's user avatar
  • 101
6 votes
0 answers
150 views

Reference for "$\mathrm{PFA}$ implies $L(\mathbb{R}) \cap \bigcup_{1 \leq k < \omega} \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^k)$ is productive"

The preprint of the recent result of Aspero and Schindler, "Martin's Maximum$^{++}$ implies Woodin's Axiom $(*)$", mentions productive pointclasses, and states that "$\mathrm{PFA}$ ...
Zoorado's user avatar
  • 1,328
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Reverse-engineer forcing: am I reinventing the wheel?

In the course of a project I’m working on, I’ve started playing around with a sort of “reverse-engineering” forcing. It seems interesting, but I have a sinking feeling I’m reinventing the wheel; does ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
417 views

$\text{cov}(\mathcal{M})$ vs. $\mathfrak{b}$ vs. $\mathfrak{s}$

Let me first recall some pretty standard notations: $\text{cov}(\mathcal{M})$ is the covering number of the ideal $\mathcal{M}$ of all meager subsets of $\mathbb{R}$; $\mathfrak{b}$ is the bounding ...
Damian Sobota's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
275 views

Proving regularity properties from forcing axioms

It's well known that PFA implies projective determinacy. It's also well known that PD implies that all projective sets are Lebesgue measurable, have the Baire property, etc. Is there a direct proof ...
Haim's user avatar
  • 391