Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
2 answers
181 views

Background for Kierstead terms

I was looking at some slides of John Longley's here, where he mentions "the Kierstead functional" $$\lambda f.f(\lambda x.f(\lambda y.x)) \ ,$$ (where $f$ should be of type $2$, and $x,y$ of ground ...
Basil's user avatar
  • 269
16 votes
2 answers
3k views

Why is there no product type in simply typed lambda-calculus?

$\DeclareMathOperator\Pair{Pair}\DeclareMathOperator\First{First}\DeclareMathOperator\Second{Second}\DeclareMathOperator\Left{Left}\DeclareMathOperator\Right{Right}\DeclareMathOperator\Choice{Choice}$...
winitzki's user avatar
  • 271
3 votes
1 answer
404 views

Is there an easy decision algorithm for the inhabitation problem for simple types?

Consider the basic system of simple types usually known as $TA_\lambda$. One can prove that (as a consequence of the Subject Reduction Property and the fact that any typable term is strongly $\beta$-...
Alfie's user avatar
  • 31
1 vote
1 answer
169 views

Interaction-based approximation for HP-complete λ-theory?

We are looking for a proof or counter-examples for the following hypothesis. Two combinators $M$ and $N$ are solvable and equivalent in the HP-complete sensible $\lambda$-theory iff either $$ \exists ...
Anton Salikhmetov's user avatar