Skip to main content

All Questions

3 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
169 views

Restriction of scalars from an Azumaya algebra and preservation of perfect/compact objects of the derived categories

An Azumaya variety over a field is by definition a pair $(X,\mathcal A_X)$, where $X$ is an algebraic variety of finite type over that field and $\mathcal A_X$ is a sheaf of Azumaya algebras, namely ...
Francesco Genovese's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
164 views

When every localization of the polynomial ring over a ring has finitely many idempotents

Let $R$ be a commutative ring such that every localization ring $R_r$ has finitely many idempotents for each non nilpotent element $r\in R$. Why dose every localization ring $R[x]_{f(x)}$ have ...
Bazara's user avatar
  • 11
1 vote
0 answers
167 views

When localization is indecomposable

We know that if $R $ is a domain then any localization of $R $ at any multiplicative subset of $R $ is indecomposable, that is, has no non trivial idempotents. Now let $R $ be a commutative ring with ...
My. A's user avatar
  • 29