Page $117$ of Atiyah, MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra text has the following theorem. Let $P(M,t)$ denote the Poincare- series of $M$.

  • $\textbf{Theorem.}$ $\bigl(\mathsf{Hilbert-Serre}\bigr)$. $P(M,t)$ is a rational function in $t$ of the form $f(t)/\prod_{i=1}^{s} (1-t^{k_i})$, where $f(t) \in \mathbf{Z}[t]$.

This theorem appears in the section of the book called Hilbert-Functions (page 116), so one understands that it could have possibly been discovered by Hilbert.

  • But why is the above theorem attributed to J.-P. Serre? References about when Serre was credited to the above theorem would be helpful.
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Probably, it is the theorem which is attributed to Serre. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jun 18 '12 at 17:01
  • 32
    $\begingroup$ I don't remember having proved this theorem. $\endgroup$ – Denis Serre Jun 19 '12 at 6:42
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Small humour and the internet are pretty inmiscible sometimes! $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jun 19 '12 at 7:47
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ About humour: Mariano understood the humour in my post (I am Jean-Pierre's nephew, and very proud to have such a reknowned mathematician in my family), but apparently Ralph didn't. Whence Mariano's comment about whether humour is soluble in internet. $\endgroup$ – Denis Serre Jun 19 '12 at 8:04
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @Denis Serre: It's only because you are posting the same kind of comment as soon as the name "Serre" occurs. Compare for the one to Igor's answer in mathoverflow.net/questions/97976/approachable-french-masters/…. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Jun 19 '12 at 8:17

I don't know what Atiyah-Macdonald were thinking, but I can tell you a theorem which is attributed to Serre (correctly, I think), and is relevant to this question.

Let $M$ be a finitely-generated graded $k[x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ module. Let $H^0(M)$, $H^1(M)$, ..., $H^n(M)$ be the local cohomology modules of $M$ with respect to the maximal ideal $\langle x_0,\ldots, x_n \rangle$. These are graded modules which satisfy the following properties:

Theorem: For all integers $d$, the function $$\dim M_d - \sum_{r=0}^n (-1)^r \dim H^r(M)_d$$ is polynomial in $d$.

Theorem (Serre vanishing) For $d$ sufficiently large, $H^r(M)_d=0$.

So Serre vanishing separates Hilbert's theorem into two parts: A certain function is a polynomial for all $d$, and that function is equal to the Hilbert function for large $d$.

I'm presenting this using the language of commutative algebra, which I don't think is the language Serre used. In sheaf cohomology language, let $\mathcal{M}$ be the sheaf on $\mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ corresponding to $M$ and let $\mathcal{H}^r(M) = \bigoplus_{d=-\infty}^{\infty} H^r(\mathbb{P}^{n-1}, \mathcal{M} \otimes \mathcal{O}(-d))$. Then the relation between sheaf cohomology and local cohomology is that $$\mathcal{H}^r(M) \cong H^{r+1}(M)$$ for $r \geq 1$ and there is a short exact sequence $$0 \to H^0(M) \to M \to \mathcal{H}^0(M) \to H^1(M) \to 0.$$ In this language, Serre vanishing says that, for $d$ large, $\mathcal{H}^r(M)_d=0$ for $r>0$ and $M_d \cong \mathcal{H}^0(M)_d$; this is how the result is usually stated. The first theorem in this language is that $\dim \sum_{r=0}^{n-1} (-1)^r \mathcal{H}^r(M)_d$ is a polynomial in $d$.

  • $\begingroup$ Minor quibble: according to your notation, it should be $\mathbb{P}^n$, since you start at $x_0$. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Reich Jun 20 '12 at 6:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.