5
$\begingroup$

We know that Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is $(p,p)$ for any $p>1$. But one proves first that it is weak type $(1,1)$ and then use interpolation. I am just curious to know: is there a way of proving the $(p,p)$ property directly, i.e. without using interpolation?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is the idea for the proof of interpolation allowed(splitting into two functions)? Or you expect a totally new way of proving? $\endgroup$ – Shaoming Guo Jan 15 '12 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ I am talking about a proof where you do not boil down the question to proving that it is weak $(1,1)$ and $(\infty, \infty)$. For the central H-L maximal function on the upper half space one can prove $(p,p)$ directly. $\endgroup$ – spr Jan 16 '12 at 8:28
5
$\begingroup$

Here is an old trick. Use the Poisson kernels instead of balls to define the central maximal function. Suppose that $p=2$. Then $Mf(x)=\int P_{a(x)}(x-y)f(y)dy$ for some function $a(x)>0$. Consider the adjoint operator $Vg(y)=\int P_{a(x)}(x-y)g(x)dx$ with some positive $g\in L^2$. We have $Vg(y)^2=\iint P_{a(x)}(x-y)g(x)P_{a(z)}(z-y) g(z)dx dz$, so, integrating with respect to $y$, we get $$ \int Vg(y)^2dy=\iint P_{a(x)+a(z)}(x-z)g(x)g(z)dxdz $$ Rewrite the last integral as $$ \begin{aligned} &2\iint_{\{a(x)\ge a(z)\}} P_{a(x)+a(z)}(x-z)g(x)g(z)dxdz \cr &\le C\iint P_{a(x)}(x-z)g(x)g(z)dxdz =C\int (Vg)g \end{aligned} $$ Thus $\|Vg\|_{L^2}^2\le C\langle Vg,g \rangle $, so $\|Vg\|_{L^2}\le C\|g\|_{L^2}$. The duality finishes the story.

I leave it to you to exploit what one can squeeze from this trick for $p\ne 2$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.