49
$\begingroup$

Let $A\in M_m(R)$ be an invertible square matrix over a noncommutative ring $R$. Is the transpose matrix $A^t$ also invertible? If it isn't, are there any easy counterexamples?

The question popped up while working on a paper. We need to impose that the transpose of certain matrix of endomorphisms is invertible, and we wondered if that was the same as asking if the matrix is invertible.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ +1 as the question is more subtle than it seems... $\endgroup$ Nov 16 '11 at 17:41
  • 20
    $\begingroup$ It is a classical observation due to Nathan Jacobson that a division ring such the set of invertible matrices is closed under transposition has to be a field, i.e. commutative. See mathoverflow.net/questions/47369/… $\endgroup$ Nov 16 '11 at 18:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I cannot / could not believe that this is not true in general. $\endgroup$ Nov 17 '11 at 7:06
52
$\begingroup$

See: R.N. Gupta, Anjana Khurana, Dinesh Khurana, and T.Y. Lam, Rings over which the transpose of every invertible matrix is invertible; J. Algebra 322 (2009), no. 5, 1627–1636 (MR).

Abstract: We prove that the transpose of every invertible square matrix over a ring $R$ is invertible if and only if $R/\text{rad}(R)$ is commutative. …

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note that the $\Longleftarrow$ direction is trivial (once you know that the Jacobson radical of a matrix ring is the ideal of all matrices which have all of their entries lying in the Jacobson radical of the ring itself). $\endgroup$ Nov 16 '11 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ This completely address my question. Thank you very much, Alireza! $\endgroup$
    – javier
    Nov 17 '11 at 11:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.