Timeline for Invertible matrices over noncommutative rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2011 at 11:50 | vote | accept | javier | ||
| Nov 17, 2011 at 7:06 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | I cannot / could not believe that this is not true in general. | |
| Nov 16, 2011 at 18:28 | comment | added | Andreas Thom | It is a classical observation due to Nathan Jacobson that a division ring such the set of invertible matrices is closed under transposition has to be a field, i.e. commutative. See mathoverflow.net/questions/47369/… | |
| Nov 16, 2011 at 18:28 | answer | added | Alireza Abdollahi | timeline score: 51 | |
| Nov 16, 2011 at 17:41 | comment | added | Alain Valette | +1 as the question is more subtle than it seems... | |
| Nov 16, 2011 at 17:20 | history | asked | javier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |