9
$\begingroup$

Let $H$ be a quaternionic algebra over ${\bf Q}$, and let $R$ denote a maximal ${\bf Z}$-order in $H$. Is there a theorem on the structure of the units in $R$ analogous to the Dirichlet unit theorem? Is there an analogous theorem for the $S$-units?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The unit group will be, in general, non-commutative. So what definition do you suggest for the rank? Or are you just passing to the abelianization? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 13, 2011 at 3:32
  • $\begingroup$ Chapter V, section 1 of Vigneras? $\endgroup$
    – Junkie
    Commented Apr 13, 2011 at 4:00
  • $\begingroup$ Another reference is Hull (1939): "On the Units of Indefinite Quaternion Algebras" jstor.org/stable/2371505 This is also Miyake's book Chapter 5 (Modular Forms) that does some parts as Fuchsian groups springerlink.com/content/v8r7212w353331r4 $\endgroup$
    – Junkie
    Commented Apr 14, 2011 at 10:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wish to add a reference for future visitors, but I can't add comments yet. The book by John Voight Quaternion Algebras deals with this question in section 32. $\endgroup$
    – ereznesh
    Commented Sep 17, 2021 at 5:51

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

If $H$ is definite, then the group of units of $H$ is finite. If $H$ is indefinite, then the group of units is a pretty chunky group; it embeds as a cocompact discrete subgroup of $SL(2, R)$, and the rank of its abelianization (which, if I remember correctly, can be interpreted geometrically as twice the genus of an associated modular curve) can be arbitrarily large.

All of this follows from general theorems on arithmetic subgroups of algebraic groups; this is a classical theory going back to Borel, Harish-Chandra and Ono in the 60s, and there is a nice summary in Gross's paper "Algebraic modular forms".

EDIT: You asked about S-units. Let S be a set of finite primes. If $H$ is definite, then the group of S-units in H will be a discrete cocompact subgroup of

$\prod_{p \in S} (H \otimes \mathbb{Q}_p)^\times$.

If every place in $S$ is ramified in $H$, then the kernels of the reduced norm maps $(H \otimes \mathbb{Q}_p)^\times \to \mathbb{Q}_p^\times$ are compact, so this group above maps with finite kernel to a discrete subgroup of $\prod_{p \in S} \mathbb{Q}_p^\times$ and hence its abelianization has rank equal to the size of S. This argument can be pushed substantially further: you can show that if H is a quaternion algebra over a totally real field F which is totally definite (i.e. definite at every infinite place of F), then the map from S-units of H to S-units of F has finite kernel and cokernel, so the abelianization of the S-units of F has rank $|S| + [F : \mathbb{Q}] - 1$.

My favourite case, though, is when $F = \mathbb{Q}$, $H$ is definite, and $S$ consists of a single finite place $p$ which is not ramified in $H$. Then the S-units of $H$ embed into $GL(2, \mathbb{Q}_p)$ as a discrete co-compact subgroup $\Gamma$, and the space of continuous functions on the quotient $GL(2, \mathbb{Q}_p) / \Gamma$ gives a representation of $GL(2, \mathbb{Q}_p)$ with many fascinating properties (it is an example of one of Matt Emerton's completed cohomology spaces).

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ @David Loeffler: Thanks. The finiteness of the unit group in the definite case must be easy -- following just by looking at the norm form. Your explanation of the the indefinite easy really explains what is going on. Do you have anything to add about S-units? $\endgroup$
    – akula
    Commented Apr 13, 2011 at 14:28
  • $\begingroup$ Should it be twice the genus? I'm not sure, but that seems right to me, since the abelianization of $\pi_1$ of a genus $g$ curve has rank $2g$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 13, 2011 at 17:29
  • $\begingroup$ @akula: I've added some remarks on S-units. @David Speyer: Yes, I am sure you are right. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 14, 2011 at 7:45
  • $\begingroup$ @David Loeffler: Could you expand a bit on your "favourite case"? Does this description give the rank of the abelianization of the unit group in this case? $\endgroup$
    – akula
    Commented Apr 23, 2011 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ This is a very nice topic. I was wondering about the statement on the abelianization of $H\subseteq SL(2,\mathbb R)$ being $\mathbb Z^{2g}$. If $H$ acts freely on the hyperbolic plane then I can see an argument involving universal cover. Do you know an explicit reference for the general case? $\endgroup$ Commented May 30, 2022 at 8:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .