4
$\begingroup$

It is usually stated that the (possibly uncountable) product of regular topological spaces is regular. However the only proof that I know of this fact seems to use the full axiom of choice :

See here (proof based on Mukres' Topology p.197).

Do we really need AC (does this imply AC) ? Would it hold in ZF, or in ZF + a weaker form of choice ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The standard proof that the product of regular spaces is regular does not use the Axiom of Choice.

Suppose $X_i$ ($i \in I$) are regular spaces and let $X = \prod_{i \in I} X_i$. Given a point $x \in X$ and a basic neighborhood $U = \prod_{i \in I} U_i$ of that point, we can always find a basic subneighborhood $V = \prod_{i \in I} V_i$ of $x$ such that $\overline{V} \subseteq U$. Indeed, when $U_i = X_i$ let $V_i = X_i$ too. For the finitely many $i \in I$ such that $U_i \neq X_i$, pick a neighborhood $V_i$ of $x_i$ such that $\overline{V}_i \subseteq U_i$. This only involves making finitely many choices, so the Axiom of Choice is not necessary.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Francois, just tiny addition: the existence of the product space does of course require AC. I know it's silly to mention, but maybe that was the OP's real issue, 'uncountable product' an all... $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2011 at 16:20
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Why would the existence of the product require choice? The non-emptiness of the product requires choice, but if it's empty, it's regular anyways. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2011 at 16:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .