Let $L/K$ be a quadratic Galois extension of number fields. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve.
Consider the natural map $$ F: H^1(\operatorname{Gal}(L/K), E(L)) \to \bigoplus_{v \in M_K} H^1(\operatorname{Gal}(L_w/K_v), E(L_{v_L})), $$ where $\operatorname{Gal}(L_w/K_v)$ denotes the local Galois group corresponding to the place $v$.
For an abelian group $M$, let $M^*$ denote its Pontryagin dual.
In this context, the Tate-cohomology group is represented as $$ \hat{H}^0(\operatorname{Gal}(L/K),E(L)) = E(K)/(1+\sigma)E(L). $$(In other words, if we define a map $\operatorname{trace}:E(L)\to E(K), P\to P+P^\sigma$, it is $ \operatorname{coker}(\operatorname{trace})$.)
According to p214 of the cited paper (link), it's claimed that $$ (\operatorname{coker} F)^* \cong \hat{H}^0(\operatorname{Gal}(L/K),E(L)), $$ but this is asserted without further explanation.
Could you provide some insights or suggest strategies for proving this isomorphism?
N.B.
The linked paper reads the dual of diagram $(3)$ on p 214 is the bottom diagram on p 214. lem 5 on p 214 follows immediately if we confirm the titled isomorphism.
The notation used in this question is somewhat different from that of the paper. However, this question is still self-contained. I have provided a link to the paper for reference, but there is no mention of the isomorphism discussed in this question in the paper, even though it's described using slightly different notation.