5
$\begingroup$

Motivation

The following came up in my work recently. (NB this is the motivation, not the question I'm asking. You can skip to the actual question below, which is self-contained, but not self-motivating.)

Take a symmetric group $S_n$ and some subgroup $H < S_n$. Can we find a binary relation $\sim_H$ on $\{1,\dots,n\}$ so that a permutation $f \in S_n$ satisfies $f \in H$ precisely if it preserves $\sim_H$, i.e. if $x \sim_H y$ implies $f(x) \sim_H f(y)$ for all $x,y \in \{1,\dots,n\}$?

Now, the analogous question for transformation monoids has a straightforward negative answer: the number of transformation monoids on the four-element set is known, and vastly exceeds the number of possible binary relations on the four-element set.

One can show by a direct proof that the question above also has a negative answer. While there are no counterexamples among the subgroups of $S_2$ and $S_3$, one already cannot characterize $\langle(123),(12)(34)\rangle < S_4$ as a set of permutations that preserve a relation: any relation on $\{1,2,3,4\}$ that is preserved by the two permutations generating this subgroup is in fact preserved by all elements of $S_4$.

However, this raises another question: would a naive counting argument, similar to the one used for transformation monoids, succeed given more information about the number of subgroups of $S_n$?

Question

It follows from Corollary 3.3 of László Pyber's Enumerating finite groups of given order that the number of relations on an $n$-element set definitively and permanently overtakes the number of subgroups of $S_n$ at $n = 94$.

Is there any $n < 94$ for which the symmetric group $S_n$ has more than $2^{n\times n}$ subgroups? I strongly suspect that the answer is no. Can this be proven using known results or bounds?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is the same as asking how many subgroups of Sn are the automorphism group of a digraph with vertices 1,…,n. Maybe this has been studied in the literature. The question seems to have been studied for graphs (symmetric relations) to some extent $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 15, 2023 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ @BenjaminSteinberg: Thanks! I do have some leads on the material in the Motivation section, and it's got some nice relations to 2-transitivity and primitive groups too. That part was intended as motivation / flavor text, however: what I'm really after in this question is information/bounds on the number of subgroups of $S_n$ for small $n$, which is ultimately (I think) independent of the binary relations question. Do you reckon I should signpost that more? $\endgroup$
    – Z. A. K.
    Commented Sep 16, 2023 at 1:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think it’s fine. I was referring to the motivation. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 16, 2023 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ "one already cannot characterize $\{(123),(12)(34)\} < S_4$": but this is not a subgroup. Do you mean $\langle(123),(12)(34)\rangle$ instead? note that this is just the alternating group $A_4$, so it seems that you're claiming that any $A_4$-invariant binary relation is $S_4$-invariant. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Sep 16, 2023 at 8:47
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor: Yes, that was a typo, I of course mean the subgroup generated by them, not the set. $\endgroup$
    – Z. A. K.
    Commented Sep 16, 2023 at 9:15

0

You must log in to answer this question.