0
$\begingroup$

I have no idea about an exercise in the book by Percy Deift.

Let $\mu$ be a given positive Borel measure with bounded or unbounded support on $\mathbb{R}$. If the support is unbounded, it requires that $$A_n:=\int_{\mathbb{R}}x^n\mathrm{d}\mu(x)<+\infty,\ \forall n\geqslant 0.$$

For $n\geqslant 0$, set $D_n:=\mathrm{det}(A_{i+j})_{0\leqslant i,j\leqslant n}$. Write

$$p_n(x)=\frac{\left(D_n D_{n-1}\right)^{-1/2}}{n!}\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(x-x_k)\prod_{0\leqslant i<j\leqslant n-1}\left(x_i-x_j\right)^2\mathrm{d}\mu(x_0)\cdots\mathrm{d}\mu(x_{n-1}).$$ How to verify directly that $\{p_n\}$ are the orthogonal polynomials? Recall that $\{p_n\}$ are the orthogonal polynomials, iff

$$\int_{\mathbb{R}}p_n(x)p_m(x)\mathrm{d}\mu(x)=\delta_{nm},\ \forall n,m\geqslant 0;$$ $$p_n(x)=a_{n,n}x^n+a_{n,n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{n,0},\ a_{n,n}>0.$$

Any help will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Don't know if this'll be direct enough for you, but one way to see this is by reverse-engineering the proof of Theorem 2.1.2 in

Ismail, M. (2005). Classical and quantum orthogonal polynomials in one variable. Cambridge University Press.

Namely, the hard part is seeing the following identity \begin{equation} \int_{\mathbb R^n}\dfrac{1}{n!}\prod_{k = 0}^{n-1} (x - x_k) \prod_{0 \leq i<j\leq n-1} (x_i - x_j)^2 d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}) = \int_{\mathbb R^n}\left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ x_1 & x_1^2 & \cdots & x_1^{n + 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ x_{n - 1}^{n - 1} & x_{n - 1}^n & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{2n - 1} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}). \quad (*) \end{equation}

Using this identity we can see that the monic polynomials \begin{align*}P_n(x) &:= \dfrac{1}{n!D_{n - 1}} \int_{\mathbb R^n} \prod_{k = 0}^{n-1} (x - x_k) \prod_{0 \leq i<j\leq n-1} (x_i - x_j)^2 d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1})\\ &= \dfrac{1}{D_{n - 1}} \int_{\mathbb R^n} \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ x_1 & x_1^2 & \cdots & x_1^{n + 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ x_{n - 1}^{n - 1} & x_{n - 1}^n & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{2n - 1} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}) \end{align*} satisfy $$\int x^k P_n(x) d \mu(x) = \delta_{nk} \frac{D_n}{D_{n - 1}}, \quad k \leq n. $$

So, since for a positive Borel measure we have $D_n \neq 0$, if we define $$p_n(x) := \sqrt{\frac{D_{n-1}}{D_n}}P_n(x)$$ we arrive at the required orthogonality.

To see why $(*)$ holds, recall the Vandermonde determinant formula $$ \prod_{0 \leq i<j\leq n-1} (x_i - x_j) = \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n - 1} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n - 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n - 1} \end{matrix}\right|, $$ which implies that $$ \prod_{k = 0}^{n-1} (x - x_k) \prod_{0 \leq i<j\leq n-1} (x_i - x_j)^2 = \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n - 1} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n - 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n -1} \end{matrix}\right|. $$ Now we compute the second determinant using the definition of determinants, (here I think of elements of $S_n$ acting on $(0 \ 1 \ 2 \ \cdots \ n-1)$) $$ \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n - 1} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n - 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n -1} \end{matrix}\right| = \sum_{\sigma \in S_n} \mathrm{sign}(\sigma) x_0^{k_0} \cdots x_{n - 1}^{k_{n - 1}}, \quad k_j = \sigma(j).$$ By relabeling the variables $x_j \mapsto x_{k_j}$ we see that the integral of $$ \mathrm{sign}(\sigma) \int_{\mathbb R^n} \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| x_0^{k_0} \cdots x_{n - 1}^{k_{n - 1}} d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}) = \int_{\mathbb R^n} \left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ 1 & x_1 & \cdots & x_1^{n}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & x_{n - 1} & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{n} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| x_1 x_2^2 \cdots x_{n - 1}^{n - 1} d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}) = \int_{\mathbb R^n}\left| \begin{matrix} 1 & x_0 & \cdots & x_0^{n} \\ x_1 & x_1^2 & \cdots & x_1^{n + 1}\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ x_{n - 1}^{n - 1} & x_{n - 1}^n & \cdots & x_{n - 1}^{2n - 1} \\ 1 & x & \cdots & x^n \end{matrix}\right| d\mu(x_0) \cdots d\mu(x_{n-1}). $$ Since there are $n!$ integrals on the right hand side (all of which are equal), dividing by $n!$ gives the identity we wanted.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks all the same. It's the reverse of the original process in the book by Percy Deift. I guess that the book-PD wants the readers to calculate the iterated integral directly: $\int p_n(x)p_m(x)\mathrm{d}\mu(x)$. $\endgroup$
    – MathRoc
    Commented Jul 17, 2023 at 2:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .