4
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a ring. An $R$-module $M$ is called FL (FP) if it has a finite resolution consisiting of finitely generated free (projective) modules.

Given an exact sequence of $R$-modules, $0\to M_1\to M_2\to M_3\to 0$, if two of the modules $M_1$, $M_2$ or $M_3$ are FP, then the third is FP as well. This follows, for example, from Proposition 1.4 and Proposition 4.1b of

Bieri, Robert Homological dimension of discrete groups. Second edition. Queen Mary College Mathematics Notes. Queen Mary College, Department of Pure Mathematics, London, 1981.

My question is

If two of the modules $M_1$, $M_2$ or $M_3$ are FL, is it true that the third one is also FL?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I think I see how to do this for any pair except M_2,M_3. For M_1,M_3 I think horseshoe works and for M1,M2 I think Ken Brown has a lemma in one of his papers that will work. The last case seems harder. $\endgroup$ Commented May 26, 2023 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Benjamin Steinberg: this is the case that interests me the most $\endgroup$ Commented May 27, 2023 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ That seems the last likely case. Ill think on it $\endgroup$ Commented May 27, 2023 at 22:51

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Yes, this is true. See Bourbaki, N. Éléments de mathématique. Algèbre. Chapitre 10. Algèbre homologique. (French) [Elements of mathematics. Algebra. Chapter 10. Homological algebra], Theorem 3.9.1

Let $K_0(R)$ be the Grothendieck group of $R$ and $\widetilde K_0(R)=K_0(R)/\langle [R]\rangle$. Then $[P]=0$ in $\widetilde K_0(R)$ if and only if $P$ is stably free.

For any $FP$ $R$-module $M$ having the following resolution consisting of finitely generated projective $R$-modules $$0\to P_k\to \ldots \to P_1\to P_0\to M\to 0,$$ we denote $$\chi_u^R(M)=\sum_{i=0}^k (-1)^i [P_i]\in \widetilde K_0(R).$$ Observe that $\chi_u^R(M)=0$ if and only if $M$ is $FL$.

Thus, in order to prove the claim it is enough to show that if $0\to M_1\to M_2\to M_3\to 0$ is an exact sequence of $FP$ $R$-modules, then $\chi_u(M_2)=\chi_u(M_1)+\chi_u(M_3)$.

This can easily be done by induction on $pd_R(M_1)+pd_R(M_2)+ pd_R(M_3)$, where $pd_R(M)$ is the projective dimension of $M$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .