0
$\begingroup$

Consider a collection of independent standard Gaussian variables $w_i$ for $i = 1, 2, \ldots, N$. Define its linear combination $f:=\sum_{i=1}^Na_iw_i+b_i$, where $a_i=pb_i$ ($p$ is a fixed parameter), its expectation $\mu:=\sum_{i=1}^Nb_i>0$. And from this we have $\sigma^2:=p^2\sum_{i=1}^Nb_i^2=\sum_{i=1}^Na_i^2$.

My question is: Derive a lower bound on $$\mathbb{P}(f>0)>g(\mu,\sigma^2) \text{ (or}\geq)$$

I would need the bound $g(\mu,\sigma^2)$ to be sensitive to the mean and variance of $f$. Consequently, a trade-off between the mean and variance arises, leading to the following observations:

(1) When the variance is fixed, a larger mean corresponds to a larger probability $\mathbb{P}(f > 0)$.

(2) When the mean is fixed, a smaller variance corresponds to a larger probability $\mathbb{P}(f > 0)$.

I appreciate any insights, references, or techniques that can shed light on this problem.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Eventually not what you want. I have problems understanding your question. Let $b := \sum_{i=1}^n b_i > 0$ and $c^2 := \sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2$. Then $f \sim \mathcal{N}(b,p^2 \cdot c^2)$, thus $q := \mathbb{P}(f > 0) = 1-\Phi\left(\frac{-b}{pc} \right)$ with $\Phi$ the distribution funtion of $\mathcal{N}(0,1)$. We get $\frac{-b}{pc} = \Phi^{-1}(1-q)$ and $p = \frac{-b}{c\Phi^{-1}(1-q)}$. Since $\Phi$ and $\Phi^{-1}$ are well known, what is the problem?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ (I found involving $p$ is misleading, I have delete $p$ in my original question.) $\endgroup$
    – happyle
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 10:20
  • $\begingroup$ I still don't understand your question. Maybe you are working with an erroneous equation: $\mathbb{P}(f > 0) = 1 - \mathbb{P}(f > 2b)$? $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2023 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathbb{P}(f<0)$ is equal to $\mathbb{P}(f>2b)$, since $f$ is $\mathcal{N}(b,p^2c^2)$ and its symmetric to $x=b$ am I right? $\endgroup$
    – happyle
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 10:27
  • $\begingroup$ yes you are right. But I still don't know why are you working with estimates and not with the exact expression. $\Phi$ is monotone with the consequence thart you can easily convert any bound for the probability into bounds for the coefficients $a,b,c,\ldots$. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24, 2023 at 10:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibly you are misled by a "false friend": the word "eventually" in English does not mean the same thing that "eventuell" means in French and German. $\endgroup$ Commented May 26, 2023 at 3:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.