5
$\begingroup$

Suppose that a finite group $G$ admits a Frobenius group of automorphisms $F H$ with kernel $F$ and complement $H$ such that $F$ acts without nontrivial fixed points (that is, such that $C_G(F)=1$). It is proved by Belyaev and Hartley in Centralizers of finite nilpotent subgroups in locally finite groups that $G$ is a solvable group. So, there are some papers studied on the Fitting height of $G$, exponent of $G$, rank of $G$. For example, a paper Fitting height of a finite group with a Frobenius group of automorphisms by E.I. Khukhro. I am curious about the following question.

Question: If $G$ is an abelian group which is $FH$-indecomposable and $F$ acts fixed-point-freely on $G$, I am wondering whether it is true that $G$ is homocyclic $p$-group.

Obviously, $G$ is a $p$-group for some prime $p$. If the action of $FH$ on $G$ is coprime, then a result of M. Harris shows that $G$ is homocyclic without assuming that $FH$ being a Frobenius group. So, we may assume that $p\mid |H|$. If $G$ is an elementary abelian group, then $G$ has a basis which is permuted by $H$ by Theorem 15.16 in "Character theory of finite groups" by I.M. Isaacs.

Here is an example of a very special case: $G$ is an abelian $2$-group which is $FH$-indecomposable and $FH\cong S_3$. Then $$G=C_G(H)\times C_G(H)^x$$ where $F=\langle x\rangle$. Since $F$ acts fixed-point-freely on $G$, $C_G(H)$ is a cyclic subgroup. So, $G$ is a homocyclic 2-group. Also, power map defines isomorphism of $FH$-chief factors of $G$.

Any explanation, references, suggestion and examples are appreciated.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The problem with trying to construct an example is that if $F$ has order coprime to $p$ and $H$ is a $p$-group then $FH$-modules in the principal block have fixed points, and all non-principal blocks have defect zero, so things tend to decompose. Maybe you can turn this into a proof of something. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2023 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. Sorry, I don't understand your point. Especially, the sentences "$FH$-modules in the principal block have fixed points" and "so things tend to decompose." Could you please explain more? @DaveBenson $\endgroup$
    – user44312
    Commented Apr 6, 2023 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ My understanding of "FH-modules in the principal block have fixed points" is: Brauer characters in principal block has the trivial Brauer character as its irreducible constituent. So, $|IBr(B_0)|=1$. Am I right? @DaveBenson $\endgroup$
    – user44312
    Commented Apr 6, 2023 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's right. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 6, 2023 at 22:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps Harris's proof can be modified to prove something like the following. Let $A$ be a finite abelian $p$-group on which a group $X$ acts. Suppose that that for every $X$-invariant subquotient $B/C$ of $A$ (i.e., both $B$ and $C$ are $X$-invariant) such that $B/C$ is elementary abelian, $X$ acts completely reducibly on $B/C$. Then $A$ is the direct sum of $X$-invariant homocyclic subgroups. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 7, 2023 at 15:42

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be an $\mathbb{F}_p[X]$-module such that $p\mid |G|$. Then $V$ is not necessarily completely reducible. A classical example is: $X\cong C_p$ and $V\cong C_p \times C_p$ and $XV$ is extraspecial $p$-group of order $p^3$.

Richard Lyons's idea is: when a group $X$ acting completely reducibly on every $X$-invariant elementary abelian subquotient of $A$, $A$ must decompose into a direct product of $X$-invariant homocyclic groups. Here is a proof based on the idea of Richard Lyons.

Proposition Let $A$ be a finite abelian $p$-group on which a group $X$ acts. Suppose that that for every $X$-invariant subquotient $B/C$ of $A$ $($i.e., both $B$ and $C$ are $X$-invariant) such that $B/C$ is elementary abelian, $X$ acts completely reducibly on $B/C$. Then $A$ is a direct product of $X$-invariant homocyclic subgroups.

Proof Let $A$ be a counterexample of minimal possible order. Then $A$ is $X$-indecomposable. Let $\overline{A}=A/\Phi(A)$, and observe that $X$ acts completely reducibly on $\overline{A}$. Then $$\overline{A}=\overline{B}\times \overline{C}$$ where $\overline{B}$ and $\overline{C}$ is completely reducible such that $\Phi(A)=B\cap C$, $\exp(B)=\exp (A)$. By the minimality of $A$, $B$ and $C$ are both direct product of $X$-invariant homocyclic subgroups, and, without loss of generality, we may assume that $B$ is homocyclic. Also, $\Phi(B)=\Phi(A)$. Let $F$ be a maximal homocyclic subgroup of $A$ containing $B$. Then $\Phi(B)\leq \Phi(F)\leq \Phi(A)$. However, since $\Phi(B)=\Phi(A)$, $\Phi(F)=\Phi(B)$, and hence $B=F$ (as $F$ is homocyclic). By Krull-Remak-Schmidt's theorem, $A=B\times V$ where $V$ is elementary abelian (as $\Phi(A)=\Phi(B)$), i.e. $A=B\Omega_1(A)$, where $\Omega_1(A)$ is a subgroup of $A$ generating by every element of order 2 in $A$. By the assumption of this proposition, $\Omega_1(A)$ is completely reducible. Therefore, $\Omega_1(A)=\Omega_1(B)\times D$, where $\Omega_1(B)$ and $D$ are $X$-invariant. Observe that $B\cap D=\Omega_1(B)\cap D=1$, and hence $A=B\times D$ is $X$-decomposible, a contradiction.

I guess Dave Benson's idea is trying to show that: under the assumption of this question, every $\mathbb{F}_p[FH]$-module $M$ such that $C_M(F)=1$ is completely reducible.

The proof of Theorem 15.16 in "Character theory of finite groups" (Isaacs) use the same idea suggested by Dave Benson.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ ...module $M$ such that $C_M(F)=1$... $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2023 at 19:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .