17
$\begingroup$

As discussed in this question from last week, if $M$ is a closed manifold such that $M\times S^1$ is homeomorphic to the torus $T^{n+1}$, then $M$ is homeomorphic to $T^n$. Is the corresponding statement in the smooth category true?

Let $M$ be a closed smooth manifold such that $M\times S^1$ is diffeomorphic to $T^{n+1}$. Is $M$ diffeomorphic to $T^n$?

Here $T^n$ and $T^{n+1}$ denote tori with their standard smooth structures. By the aforementioned result, the hypotheses imply that $M$ is necessarily homeomorphic to $T^n$, so if the question has a negative answer, then there is an exotic torus $M$ with $M\times S^1$ standard, i.e. diffeomorphic to $T^{n+1}$. One could instead ask whether there is an exotic torus $M$ such that $M\times T^k$ is standard for some $k$. This is essentially the same question because if such an $M$ exists, then by taking the smallest possible $k$, the manifold $M\times T^{k-1}$ would be an exotic torus with $(M\times T^{k-1})\times S^1$ standard.

Since the topological manifold $T^n$ admits a PL structure, in dimensions five and above there is a one-to-one correspondence between PL structures on $T^n$ and $H^3(T^n; \mathbb{Z}_2)$. Moreover, each of these is smoothable, see page $236$ of Surgery on Compact Manifolds by Wall, but not uniquely. As a stepping stone towards the smooth question, it is worth considering the PL analogue.

Let $M$ be a closed PL manifold such that $M\times S^1$ is PL homeomorphic to $T^{n+1}$. Is $M$ PL homeomorphic to $T^n$?

Here $T^n$ and $T^{n+1}$ now denote tori with the PL structures induced by their standard smooth structures. As before, it is equivalent to consider the same question with $M\times S^1$ replaced by $M\times T^k$.

Note that $H^3(T^n; \mathbb{Z}_2)$ acts as a torsor on the set of PL structures on $T^n$. Fixing the standard PL structure on $T^n$, let $M_{\alpha}$ be the PL torus corresponding to $\alpha \in H^3(T^n; \mathbb{Z}_2)$. I suspect that $M_{\alpha}\times S^1 = M_{\pi^*\alpha}$ where $\pi:T^{n+1}\to T^n$ is given by $\pi(z_1, \dots, z_{n+1}) = (z_1, \dots, z_n)$. If this were the case, then the answer to the PL question would be yes: if $M_{\alpha}\times S^1 = M_{\pi^*\alpha}$ is PL homeomorphic to $T^{n+1}$, then $\pi^*\alpha = 0$ and hence $\alpha = 0$, so $M_{\alpha} = M_0 = T^n$. This would not yield an answer to the initial question though as one would need to consider the possible smoothings of the standard PL torus.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ If $T$ is a homotopy torus, then any diffeomorphism $f:T\times S^1\to T^n$ lifts to a diffeomorphism of covering spaces corresponding to $\pi_1(T)\times 1$ and its $f_*$-image. It is a diffeomorphism from $T\times\mathbb R$ to $T^{n-1}\times\mathbb R$. This defines an h-cobordism between $T$ and $T^{n-1}$, and since tori have trivial Whitehead group, by the s-cobordism theorem we get a diffeomorphism of $T$ and $T^{n-1}$ if $n\ge 6$. The case $\dim(T)=3$ follows by the Poincare conjecture (due to Perelman). The only remaining case is when $T$ is $4$-dimensional. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 15:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The above assumes that $T$ is smoothable (to apply the smooth h-cobordsim theorem to any smooth structure on $T$). For homotopy tori of dimension $\ge 4$ smoothability is proved in [Fake tori, Hsiang-Shaneson], corollary 4.3, maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/hsiashan.pdf. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ @IgorBelegradek: Thanks! Even though it doesn't cover the four-dimensional case, would you be willing to expand your comments into an answer? I wouldn't be surprised if the four-dimensional case is open. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 16:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The existence of an exotic 4-torus (or more generally any exotic aspherical closed 4-manifold) is a well-known open problem. I seem to recall that most exotic 4-manifolds must become standard after taking product with a circle. Please feel free to write the answer yourself - I am not sufficiently motivated. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 16:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @IgorBelegradek: I can see how a diffeomorphism from $T\times\mathbb{R}$ to $T^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}$ gives rise to a cobordism between $T$ and $T^{n-1}$, but I don't see why it is an h-cobordism. Is it always the case that a cobordism constructed this way is an h-cobordism, or are you using the asphericity of $T$ and $T^{n-1}$ somehow? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 8, 2022 at 16:32

1 Answer 1

16
$\begingroup$

Thanks to Igor Belegradek for his help in the comments. This answer is merely an expansion of his remarks.

The proof of the following proposition was adapted from the paper A simplification problem in manifold theory by Hausmann and Jahren, specifically Propositions $3.3$ and $3.11$.

Proposition: Let $M$ and $N$ be connected closed smooth manifolds such that $M\times\mathbb{R}$ and $N\times\mathbb{R}$ are diffeomorphic. Then $M$ and $N$ are smoothly $h$-cobordant.

Proof: Let $f : M\times\mathbb{R} \to N\times\mathbb{R}$ be a diffeomorphism. Note that $f^{-1}$ restricts to a diffeomorphism $(M\times\mathbb{R})\setminus f^{-1}(N\times\{0\}) \to N\times(-\infty, 0)\cup N\times(0,\infty)$. Let $A$ and $B$ be the connected components of $(M\times\mathbb{R})\setminus f^{-1}(N\times\{0\})$ with $B$ being the component containing points $(m, x)$ with $x$ arbitrarily large. By postcomposing $f$ with the map $N\times\mathbb{R} \to N\times\mathbb{R}$, $(n, x) \mapsto (n, -x)$ if necessary, we can assume that $f(A) = N\times(-\infty, 0)$ and $f(B) = N\times(0,\infty)$. Since $N$ is compact, the projection of $f^{-1}(N\times\{0\})$ to $\mathbb{R}$ is compact, so we can choose $s \in \mathbb{R}$ with $M\times\{s\} \subset B$ and hence $f(M\times\{s\}) \subset N\times (0, \infty)$. By the compactness of $M$, we can choose $\alpha > 0$ such that $f(M\times\{s\}) \subset N\times(0, \alpha)$.

Let $C = (N\times[0,\infty))\cap f(M\times(-\infty, s])$ be the bounded region between $N\times\{0\}$ and $f(M\times\{s\})$. This is a smooth cobordism between $N$ and $M$. We will prove that the inclusion $i: N \to C$, $n \mapsto (n, 0)$ is a homotopy equivalence. The same arguments can be used to show that $j: M \to C$, $m \mapsto f(m, s)$ is a homotopy equivalence (by considering $f^{-1}(C)$), so $C$ is in fact a smooth $h$-cobordism.

First note that the composition $N \xrightarrow{i} C \hookrightarrow N\times\mathbb{R} \xrightarrow{\operatorname{pr}_1} N$ is simply $\operatorname{id}_N$, so $i$ induces injective homomorphisms $i_* : \pi_k(N) \to \pi_k(C)$ for every $k$.

Now choose $t > s$ such that $f(M\times\{t\}) \subset N\times(\alpha, \infty)$. Let $C' = f(M\times[s, \infty))\cap (N\times(-\infty,\alpha])$ be the region bounded between $f(M\times\{s\})$ and $N\times\{\alpha\}$, and $C'' = (N\times[\alpha, \infty))\cap f(M\times(-\infty, t])$ be the region bounded between $N\times\{\alpha\}$ and $f(M\times\{t\})$.

enter image description here

Note that the composition $C \hookrightarrow C\cup C' = N\times[0,\alpha] \hookrightarrow C\cup C'\cup C'' = C\cup f(M\times[s, t]) \to C$ is $\operatorname{id}_C$, where the last map is a deformation retract. Therefore the map $\varphi : N\times[0,\alpha] \to C$ induces surjections on homotopy groups. Since $i : N \to C$ factorises as $N \xrightarrow{i_0} N\times[0,\alpha] \xrightarrow{\varphi} C$ where $i_0 : N \to N\times[0,\alpha]$, $n \mapsto (n, 0)$ is a homotopy equivalence, we see that $i_* : \pi_k(N) \to \pi_k(C)$ is surjective for every $k$.

So the inclusion $i : N\to C$ induces isomorphisms $i_* : \pi_k(N) \to \pi_k(C)$ for every $k$, and is therefore a homotopy equivalence. $\qquad\square$

In the language of the aforementioned paper, $C$, $C'$, and $C''$ are invertible cobordisms with $[C'] = [C]^{-1}$ and $[C''] = [C]$.

Theorem: Let $M$ be a smooth manifold homeomorphic to $T^n$ and suppose $M\times S^1$ is diffeomorphic to $T^{n+1}$. If $n \neq 4$, then $M$ is diffeomorphic to $T^n$.

Proof: Note that $\pi_1(M) \cong \mathbb{Z}^n$. For $n \leq 3$, it follows that $M$ is diffeomorphic to $T^n$ - see this question for the $n = 3$ case. Now suppose that $n \geq 5$.

Let $f : M\times S^1 \to T^{n+1}$ be a diffeomorphism. The covering space of $M\times S^1$ corresponding to $\pi_1(M)\times 1 \subset \pi_1(M\times S^1)$ is $M\times\mathbb{R}$, while $f_*(\pi_1(M)\times 1) \cong \mathbb{Z}^n$, so the corresponding covering space of $T^{n+1}$ is diffeomorphic to $T^n\times\mathbb{R}$. It follows that $M\times\mathbb{R}$ is diffeomorphic to $T^n\times\mathbb{R}$. By the Proposition above, there is a smooth $h$-cobordism between $M$ and $T^n$. Since the Whitehead group of $\mathbb{Z}^n$ is trivial and $n \geq 5$, the $h$-cobordism is diffeomorphic to a cylinder by the $s$-cobordism theorem, so $M$ is diffeomorphic to $T^n$. $\qquad\square$

This leaves only $n = 4$. It is not known if exotic tori exist in dimension four, but if they do, there may be infinitely many of them (as often happens in dimension four). If that were the case, there would be infinitely many non-diffeomorphic pairs $(M, N)$ of smooth manifolds homeomorphic to $T^4$ with $M\times S^1$ diffeomorphic to $N\times S^1$ (because there are only finitely many smooth manifolds homeomorphic to $T^5$). However, it does not necessarily follow that there are any such pairs with $N = T^4$.

Question (open?): Could there be an exotic four-torus such that its product with a circle is diffeomorphic to $T^5$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ There is a typo at the end of the statement of the Theorem: should be $T^n$ rather than $T^4$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 8, 2023 at 2:29
  • $\begingroup$ @IgorBelegradek: Fixed. Thanks for pointing out the typo and for your comments which led to the answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 8, 2023 at 4:03
  • $\begingroup$ I am glad you wrote this up (so I don't have to). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 8, 2023 at 12:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .