-1
$\begingroup$

On why this is here I tried posting on math stackexchange but I got no comments or answers. I even bountied the question but I am still not getting any responses. I am getting the sense that I wasn't posting in the correct forum. If this is also not the correct place to ask this please let me know.

I would like to prove the following result

enter image description here

I will be quoting the previous result and its proof :

enter image description here

Proof for Theorem 1.4 Suppose $\exists (a,b)\in D(0,1)$ such that $u(a,b)>0$. Let \begin{align*} X = \left\{z: |z|\leq 1 \quad \text{and} \quad z\neq z_0 \right\} \end{align*} If $u$ has a maximum in $D(0,1)$, then apply the same argument as in the proof of the above theorem. Else consider $C_{R}$ defined by \begin{align*} C_{R}=\left(D(0,1) \cup \partial D(0,1)\right) \setminus D(z_0,R) \end{align*} illustrated as

enter image description here

By construction $u$ achieves its minimum and maximum on the boundary $\partial C_{R}$. Let \begin{align*} M= \sup \left\{\max_{C_{R}}u \mid 0<R<1 \right\} \end{align*} which exists as $u$ is bounded and because the set is non empty. By assumption $u$ can not achieve $M$ on $X$.

Now given $\epsilon>0$, define \begin{align*} T=\left\{\max_{C_{R}}u \mid 0<R<\epsilon \right\} \end{align*} By construction \begin{align*} M=\sup T. \end{align*} By definition, given $\delta >0$, there exists $\tau $ with $0<\tau<\epsilon$ such that \begin{align*} \max_{C_{\tau }}u & > \sup T + \delta \\ & = M +\delta \end{align*} by applying the definition of supremum of $T$. Now we use continuity. For any point $z_1 $ on the boundary of the open disc, except for $z_0$, we have that given $A>0$ , there exists $B>0$ such that \begin{align*} |z-z_1 |<B \implies |u(z)-u(z_1 )|<A \end{align*} By hypothesis, the maximum on $C_{\tau }$ lies on the semi circle. Let $z_2$ be that point. Then let $z_3$ be one of the points where the circle and semi circle intersect. Then \begin{align*} |z_3-z_2|<2\tau \end{align*} geometrically as they lie on the same circle of radius $\tau $. Take $A<M$. Now set $\epsilon<\frac{B}{2}$, so $\tau<\frac{B}{2}$. Then \begin{align*} |z_3 -z_2|<B \end{align*} and \begin{align*} |u(z_3)-u(z_2)|& = |u(z_2)| \\ & > M +\delta > A \end{align*} which contradicts the continuity.

Question: Does my proof hold?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ At the beginning. Did you set $z_0=(a,b)$? The argument from the above Theorem does not apply directly, since precisely $u\neq0$ on the boundary, and isn't continuous. Where are the points of discontinuity in your discussion? $\endgroup$
    – username
    Jul 5, 2022 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @username , apologies for the unclarity. I set $z_0$ to be the point of discontinuity on the unit disc. I set $(a,b)$ to be a point in the closed unit disc, with $z_0$ removed, such that $u(a,b)>0$. Is this clearer? Also, I are you sure that a similar argument to the above theorem doesn't hold? I am not saying it applies directly, but an identical proof works. $\endgroup$ Jul 5, 2022 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ The "but u=0 on the boundary" part doesn't hold. $\endgroup$
    – username
    Jul 6, 2022 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, what I am using from the first theorem is not the statement. I am using the proof. More specifically, I am using the fact that we proved that the maximum is always achieved on the boundary. Does that make moresense? $\endgroup$ Jul 6, 2022 at 21:40

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is a consequence of the Phragmen-Lindelof Principle, whose general formulation is the following: Let $D$ be a bounded region in the plane, and $\zeta_0\in\partial D$. Let $u$ be a subharmonic function in $D$ bounded from above, and assume that $$\limsup_{z\to\zeta} u(z)\leq 0$$ for all $\zeta\in\partial D\backslash\{\zeta_0\}$. Then $u\leq 0$ in $D$.

Proof. WLOG assume that $D$ is contained in the unit disk, and $\zeta_0=0$. Then the function $$u_\epsilon(z)=u(z)+\epsilon\log|z|$$ with any $\epsilon>0$ satisfies $$\limsup_{z\to\zeta} u_\epsilon(z)\leq 0\quad \zeta\in\partial D,$$ so $v_\epsilon\leq 0$ by Maximum Principle. Now for any fixed $z$, let $\epsilon\to 0$, and we conclude that $u(z)\leq 0$.

This has an evident generalization to finitely many boundary points instead of one, and to unbounded regions. Also the condition of boundedness from above can be relaxed in many ways.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, thank you for the answer. I have two questions. 1) Shouldn't you remove the point of dscountinuity from $\partial D$ for the first statement of the proof? 2) Do you think that my proof holds? (you might have to also refer to the comments) $\endgroup$ Jul 5, 2022 at 15:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.