5
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a connected split reductive group over a finite field $k$. Suppose $G$ has connected centre. Let $T$ be a maximal split torus with Weyl group $W$. Note that $W$ acts on the finite group $T(k)$; thus, it acts on characters of $T(k)$.

Let $\theta: T(k) \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^\times$ be a $W$-invariant character.

Question: Does $\theta$ extend to a character of $G(k)$?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Isn't the order $2$ character of the split torus of $SL_2(\mathbb F_p)$ a counterexample? $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Jun 9, 2022 at 23:08
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ But the centre of SL_2 is disconnected (in characteristic not equal to 2). $\endgroup$
    – Dr. Evil
    Jun 10, 2022 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ What about $\textbf{PGL}_2$, then? $\endgroup$ Jun 10, 2022 at 1:57
  • $\begingroup$ I think the order 2 character of maximal torus of PGL_2 actually extends to all of PGL_2(k). (Note abelianization of PGL_2(k) is nontrivial) $\endgroup$
    – Dr. Evil
    Jun 10, 2022 at 6:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Dr.Evil, indeed, for $p \ne 2$ (otherwise there is no non-trivial character!) the desired extension is $g \mapsto \operatorname{sgn}_k(\det(g))$. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Jun 12, 2022 at 13:06

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Edit. The answer below is incorrect. The correct computation is the determinant of the Cartan matrix, which happens to equal $1$ for $E_8$.

I believe the answer is "no" for $G$ equal to the split form of $E_8$ over a finite field $k$ of odd characteristic. The set of rational points is a simple finite group. The center of $E_8$ is trivial. For a maximal split torus $T$, I believe the action of the Weyl group $W$ on $T(k)/(T(k))^2$ is trivial, since $W$ is generated by simple reflections arising from copies of $\textbf{SL}_2$ in the group (the "root groups"), and the action of the Weyl group is trivial for $\textbf{SL}_2$. So this would mean that every nontrivial character of $T(k)/(T(k))^2$ gives a counterexample.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. I'm not following the argument that $W$ acts trivially $T(k)/(T(k))^2$. I would appreciate more details. $\endgroup$
    – Dr. Evil
    Jun 13, 2022 at 0:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.