8
$\begingroup$

The setting: $M$ an arbitrary smooth manifold, $G$ a Lie group acting effectively and properly on $M$ by diffeomorphisms.

Motivation: when trying to figure out the homeomorphism type of the orbit space, one tries to find a "fundamental domain" $D$ that contains exactly one representative of each orbit except for a set of measure zero on which identifications may occur, in which case you have some orbits with more than one representative. You want the projection $\pi:M \rightarrow M / G$ to restrict to a quotient map on your fundamental domain so that you're sure $D / G$ is homeomorphic to $M / G$.

I have only seen good definitions for what is meant by "fundamental domain" in the case of properly discontinuous actions, and the conversation seems to focus on the free action of a discrete Lie group—see Misha's answer to Proper discontinuity and existence of a fundamental domain for example—, but I am interested in non-free actions of not-necessarily-discrete Lie groups, and researchers in my field take "fundamental domain" to be an undefined intuitive concept, so think of a "fundamental domain" in whatever way you see fit.

The question: can you think of any example of an action in this setting where you can restrict to a subset (no restrictions on the properties of the set, but the less pathological the better) $D$ that contains at least one representative of every orbit, but such that $D / G$ is not homeomorphic to $M / G$ or (equivalently?) $\pi\rvert_D$ fails to be a quotient map?

In other words, is it possible for the "fundamental domain" thinking to go wrong?

If not, can you prove a sense in which it always works?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Answers can move, so it is better to link to a specific answer than to refer to the position of an answer. Since the question to which you linked had only one answer, I thought it was probably clear what was meant, and edited to change the link accordingly. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 17, 2021 at 1:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just saw your question. It seems that this paper may have an answer for you? I'm yet to read the paper, but in the introduction session, the author writes: "This is just a generalization of the classical concept of fundamental domain, usually formulated for G discrete. In this work we show that fundamental domains with nice properties exist for a large class of nondiscrete transformation groups: We assume that M is a complete, connected Riemannian manifold and that G is a closed subgroup of the group of isometries of M". Sorry if this isn't helpful! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 21 at 14:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, but forgot to mention the paper: On the Existence of a Fundamental Domain for Riemannian Transformation Groups Author(s): Robert Hermann Source: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , Jun., 1962, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Jun., 1962), pp. 489-494 Published by: American Mathematical Society Stable URL: jstor.org/stable/2034968 $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 22 at 9:50

0

You must log in to answer this question.