7
$\begingroup$

Let

  • $E$ be the usual sobolev space $H^{1}_{0}(\Omega)$ on a smoothly bounded domain $\Omega$,
  • $E_{k}$ be its subspace spanned by the first $k$ eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator, i.e. $$E_{k}:=\text{span}\{\varphi_{j}\in E: -\Delta\varphi_{j}=\lambda_{j}\varphi_{j},~j=1,2\dots,k \},$$
  • $P$ be the positive cone in $E$, i.e, $$P:=\{u \in E~; u \geq 0 ~a.e.\},$$

Now set $P_{k}=P\cap E_{k}~~u^{-}=min\{u,0\}$.

My question: does it exist $C_{k}>0$, such that $$\text{dist}_{L^{2}}(u,P_{k}) \leq C_{k} \text{dist}_{L^{2}}(u,P)~\text{ holds }~\forall u\in E_{k}\; ?$$ or $$\text{dist}_{E}(u,P_{k}) \leq C_{k} \text{dist}_{E}(u,P)~\text{ holds }~\forall u\in E_{k}\; ?$$ or $$\text{dist}_{E}(u,P_{k}) \leq C_{k} \|u^{-}\|_{E}~\text{ holds }~\forall u\in E_{k}\; ?$$ If not, could you please show me a counterexample? Thanks.

Moreover, this problem is raised from the proof of lemma 3.6 in "Infinitely many solutions to perturbed elliptic equations",doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2005.06.014 enter image description here

also see lemma 5.4 in "On finding sign-changing solutions",doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2005.09.004 enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This is not Lemma 3.6 in that paper, but Lemma 5.4 not in that paper since it stops at section 4. The proof of Lemma 3.6 is different. $\endgroup$
    – username
    Commented Oct 13, 2021 at 5:07
  • $\begingroup$ @username I have corrected the wrong description , and these two papers are the same author. $\endgroup$
    – sorrymaker
    Commented Oct 13, 2021 at 6:35

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

The first is not true, and probably also the others.

Take $L^2(0, \pi)$ and $u_1=\sin x$, $u_2=\sin (2x)$, so that $E_2=\{u=a\sin x+b \sin (2x)\}$ and $u \geq 0$ iff $a \geq 0$ and $2|b| \leq a$. If $v=\alpha sin x+\beta \sin (2x)$, then $\|u-v\|_2^2=\frac{\pi}{2} \left((a-\alpha)^2+(b-\beta)^2\right)$ and, if $v_\epsilon=\sin x-\frac{1+\epsilon}{2}\sin (2x)$, the closest positive $u \in E_2$ is $u=\sin x-\frac{1}{2}\sin (2x)$ and $\|v_\epsilon -u\|_2 \approx \epsilon$. On the other hand, $v_\epsilon$ is negative in an interval starting from 0 of length $\approx \sqrt \epsilon$ where the function is of order $\epsilon^{3/2}$ and $\|v^-\|_2 \leq C\epsilon^{7/4}$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is the right answer. But it's worth noting that all counterexamples are "like" this one, in the sense that they have $(u, \varphi_1) \geq c \|u\|_{L^2}$. $\endgroup$
    – user378654
    Commented Oct 12, 2021 at 21:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user378654 Could you explain with some more detail what you mean? Many thanks $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2021 at 6:29
3
$\begingroup$

This does not answer the question asked (see the other answer for a good counterexample) and I don't know if it's relevant to the paper. However, if $u$ is sufficiently far from $\varphi_1$, the first eigenfucntion, you do get a positive answer. Below I assume $\Omega$ is connected (you'd have to work out what happens more carefully if it's not).

First, we have that $$ \|u\|_{L^\infty} \leq C(k) \|u\|_{L^2} $$ for any $u \in E_k$; this can be checked for each $\phi_j$ and is standard (there is a clean argument with the heat kernel, or you can just apply the local maximum principle repeatedly on balls). Also, $\varphi_1 > 0$ on $\Omega$.

Now consider $u \in E_k$ with $\int u^2 = 1$ and $$ \int u \varphi_1 = a. $$ We have that $$ \int |u|\varphi_1 \geq c(k) $$ using only that $|u|\leq C(k)$ and $\int u^2 = 1$. Indeed, this integral is minimized by a piecewise constant function $u$ which is $C(k)$ on $F = \{\varphi_1 < t\}$ and $0$ outside of $F$, where $t$ is chosen so that $|F| = 1/C(k)^2$. Setting $c(k) = C(k) \int_F \varphi_1 > 0$ gives the inequality.

Combining, we have that $$ \|u_-\|_{L^2} \geq \int u_- \varphi_1 \geq \frac{c(k) - a}{2}. $$ Undoing the normalization, we have shown that for $u \in E_k$, if $\int u \varphi_1 \leq \frac{c(k)}{2} \|u\|_{L^2}$, then $$ \|u\|_{L^2} \leq \frac{4}{c(k)} \|u_-\|_{L^2}. $$ This implies both inequalities in the question in this case (the $L^2$ and $H^1_0$ norms of each side are comparable). In particular, it applies to any $u \in E_k$ orthogonal to $\varphi_1$, so to any eigenfunction $\varphi_j$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks for the explanation. How do you see that the right minimizer is what you indicated? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 13, 2021 at 13:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, to minimize the integral you want to put all the mass where $\varphi_1$ is smallest. You can justify formally using the layercake integration formula $\int \varphi_1 |u| = \int_0^\infty t\int_{\{ \varphi_1 = t\}} |u(x)| d\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(x) dt$. $\endgroup$
    – user378654
    Commented Oct 13, 2021 at 17:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .