Suppose $E$ is a complex-oriented ring spectrum whose formal group law is isomorphic to the additive one. As the title suggests, we might as well change the complex orientation so that the formal group law is literally the additive one. Is $E$ an $H\mathbb{Z}$-algebra?
1 Answer
This is an answer to the question in the title, which is what I had meant to ask: is an $E$ as in the question body an $H\mathbb{Z}$-module? (the last sentence of the question body is stronger and likely has a negative answer)
The answer is yes. Here is an outline of the proof. The vast majority of the following was outlined to me by Robert Burklund and Eric Peterson, but as usual all the errors are mine, etc, etc.
The first step is to reduce to the connective case by noting that $E$ being an $H\mathbb{Z}$-module is equivalent to asking that the unit map $\mathbb{S}\rightarrow E$ factor through $H\mathbb{Z}$, as a map of spectra, and the unit map of $E$ always factors through its connective cover.
The next step is to show that the coation of the mod $p$ dual Steenrod algebra $(H\mathbb{F}_p)_*H\mathbb{F}_p$ on $(H\mathbb{F}_p)_*E$ (and also $(H\mathbb{F}_p)_*(E/p)$ which is needed later) on is cofree for all $p$. There are probably a lot of ways to do that, my favorite being to take the "formal geometry" perspective by considering the action-of-a-group-scheme-on-another-scheme that the coaction map in question corepresents, and constructing an equivariant map to a scheme on which the group scheme clearly acts freely. This is where you use the fact that you can choose a complex orientation of $E$ in which the formal group law of $E$ is equal to the additive formal group law.
The next step is to make some arguments using the Adams spectral sequence: the previous step implies that the $H\mathbb{F}_p$-ASS for $E/p$ is concentrated on the zero line. Since $E$ is connective, $E/p$ is $H\mathbb{F}_p$-nilpotent which implies that the Hurewicz map $E/p\rightarrow H\mathbb{F}_p\wedge E/p$ is an injection on homotopy groups. Choosing a basis of $\pi_*(E/p)$ and extending it to a basis of $\pi_*(H\mathbb{F}_p\wedge E/p)$ defines an equivalence from a wedge of shifts of $H\mathbb{F}_p$ $X_p$ to $H\mathbb{F}_p\wedge E/p$. Let $Y_p$ be the summand of $X_p$ corresponding to basis elements of $\pi_*(E/p)$. Then the map $E/p\rightarrow H\mathbb{F}_p\wedge E/p\simeq X_p\rightarrow Y_p$ is a weak equivalence, and $Y_p$ is an $H\mathbb{F}_p$-module.
The final step is to invoke a lemma that says that if $E/p$ is an $H\mathbb{F}_p$-module for all $p$, then $E$ is an $H\mathbb{Z}$-module, which involves an argument about $k$-invariants being visibile mod $p$ for some $p$.
-
1$\begingroup$ Is it more natural to use the (modified) ANSS [here I mean the modified sseq as in, e.g., Devinatz's 'morava modules' paper]? I think we can we change the coordinate so that E has the literal additive fgl first (right?), then the (modified) ANSS for maps from HZ to E becomes Ext_{BP_}(Z[t_1, t_2, ...], E_) = Ext_Z(Z[t_i]/(pt_i), E_) (since BP_--->E_* factors through the augmentation). That's concentrated on the 0 and 1 line so has to collapse right away. In particular, the 'evaluation at 1' map to E_* is surjective. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7, 2021 at 21:15
-
$\begingroup$ @DylanWilson You're right about being able to make the FGL exactly additive (I use that in my version too) and I totally believe you on this ANSS suggestion, my knowledge of ASS and ANSS is completely contained in this post :) $\endgroup$– kiranCommented Oct 7, 2021 at 22:25