0
$\begingroup$

Let $k=s$ be a positive definite symmetric function and a simililarity over the natural numbers such that $k(a,a) = 1 $ for all natural numbers $a$.

A similarity $s:X\times X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is defined in Encyclopedia of Distances as:

  1. $s(x,y) \ge 0 \forall x,y \in X$

  2. $s(x,y) = s(y,x) \forall x,y \in X$

  3. $s(x,y) \le s(x,x) \forall x,x \in X$

  4. $s(x,y) = s(x,x) \iff x=y$

We can define the metric $d(x,y) = \sqrt{k(x,x)+k(y,y)-2k(x,y)}=\sqrt{2(1-k(x,y)}$.

Every $3$ point metric space can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^2$ as a triangle, (See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3393140/whats-the-name-of-this-surface-a2b2c22abc-1-0 ), and hence for each triple of distinct natural numbers $x,y,z$ we get a triangle.

For three points $x,y,z$ in a metric space, we can define (using the law of cosines) the following quantity:

$$S(x,y,z) = \frac{d(x,y)^2+d(y,z)^2-d(x,z)^2}{2d(x,y)d(y,z)}$$

We then have:

$$\pi = \arccos(S(x,y,z))+\arccos(S(z,x,y))+\arccos(S(y,z,x))$$

wich I consider to be an invariant, because it does not depend on the metric space $(X,d)$. (and has a nice effect of yielding some amusing formulas for $\pi$ https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4183066/some-formulas-for-pi ).

Now my naive question is, if it is possible to define other invariants for each simplex corresponding to a subset of $n$ natural numbers, which is independent on the function $k=s$ chosen.

The only thing we know are the properties above about $k=s$ or $d$.

(We can also assume that the determinant of the Gramian matrix $k(x_i,x_j)$ for each subset $x_i$ of pairwise distinct $x_i,x_j$ is not zero.)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I have found an answer:

The right generalisation of this question from triangles to simplices is the question of dihedral angles:

In the book "Matrices and Graphs in Geometry" by Miroslav Fiedler, we have the following generalisation of the sum of angles equals $\pi$ in triangles:

dihedral angles in simplices

Here is some Sagemath-Code which implements this idea.

For example for $3$ points we have the following algebraic variety given by $\det = 0$ :

$$0 = 2 \, c_{12} c_{13} c_{23} - c_{12}^{2} - c_{13}^{2} - c_{23}^{2} + 1$$

which is the Cayley nodal cubic.

For $4$ points we have the following algebraic variety given by $\det = 0$: $$0 = c_{14}^{2} c_{23}^{2} - 2 \, c_{13} c_{14} c_{23} c_{24} + c_{13}^{2} c_{24}^{2} - 2 \, c_{12} c_{14} c_{23} c_{34} - 2 \, c_{12} c_{13} c_{24} c_{34} + c_{12}^{2} c_{34}^{2} + 2 \, c_{12} c_{13} c_{23} + 2 \, c_{12} c_{14} c_{24} + 2 \, c_{13} c_{14} c_{34} + 2 \, c_{23} c_{24} c_{34} - c_{12}^{2} - c_{13}^{2} - c_{14}^{2} - c_{23}^{2} - c_{24}^{2} - c_{34}^{2} + 1$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.