Let $A$ be an Artin algebra, $\text{Mod}\,A$ the category of $A$-modules and $\text{mod}\,A$ the category of finitely generated $A$-modules. It is well-known that $\text{mod}\,A$ is a Krull-Schmidt category. Can we find a larger full subcategory $\mathcal{C}$ of $\text{Mod}\,A$, such that it remains a Krull-Schmidt category? Is there a largest $\mathcal{C}$ and if yes, how does $\mathcal{C}$ look like? What happens if we additionally demand $\mathcal{C}$ to be an abelian category?
-
2$\begingroup$ The full subcategory of $A$-modules with semiperfect endomorphism ring is a Krull-Schmidt subcategory of $Mod\text{-}A$, and must be largest one with this property. Your first question is therefore equivalent to whether there is a non-finitely generated $A$-module with a semiperfect endomorphism ring. (I interpreted your definition of a Krull-Schmidt category as the one given on Wikipedia. Please correct me if I am mistaken.) $\endgroup$– Uriya FirstCommented May 19, 2021 at 9:07
-
$\begingroup$ Yes, that definition is correct. Does such a module always exist for infinite representation type? Also the more interesting case would be if we demand the category to be albelian. $\endgroup$– kevkev1695Commented May 19, 2021 at 9:49
1 Answer
To answer the first question, there is a larger Krull-Schmidt category than $\text{mod}\,A$ unless $A$ has finite representation type.
Every indecomposable pure-injective module has local endomorphism ring, and an Artin algebra of infinite representation type has an infinitely generated indecomposable pure-injective module.
So you could take $\mathcal{C}$ to be the full subcategory of finite direct sums of pure-injective modules.
[The claims above about pure-injective modules can be found, for example, as Theorem 4.3.43 and Theorem 5.3.40 of
Prest, Mike, Purity, spectra and localisation., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (ISBN 978-0-521-87308-6/hbk). xxviii, 769 p. (2009). ZBL1205.16002.]
I doubt this is often maximal. As Uriya First pointed out in comments, the maximal Krull-Schmidt subcategory of $\text{Mod}\,A$ will consist of all finite direct sums of modules with local endomorphism ring.
I also doubt that it will often (or ever, maybe) be abelian, for the following reason.
If $\mathcal{C}$ is a subcategory of $\text{Mod}\,A$ containing $\text{mod}\,A$ that is abelian, then since $\mathcal{C}$ contains $A$ and $DA$ it follows that exact sequences in $\mathcal{C}$ are exact in $\text{Mod}\,A$, so $\mathcal{C}$ is closed under kernels and cokernels in $\text{Mod}\,A$.
Often this can be used to show that if $\mathcal{C}$ contains an infinitely generated module then it contains an infinite direct sum of simple modules, and so cannot be Krull-Schmidt. I don't know if this is always the case, but here's one illustrative case:
Suppose $A$ is local, and $\mathcal{C}$ is an abelian subcategory of $\text{Mod}\,A$ that contains an infinitely generated module $X$. Then if $\operatorname{rad}^iX$ is the last nonzero power of the radical, there is a map $X\to X$ whose cokernel is $X/\operatorname{rad}^iX$. By induction, $\mathcal{C}$ contains $X/\operatorname{rad}X$, which is an infinite direct sum of simple modules.