13
$\begingroup$

When I read the GTM 082, "The Splitting Principle of the complex vector bundle", I see that in the proof we split off one subbundle at a time by pulling back to the projectivization of a quotient bundle. I don't know why we need to pull this back to the projectivization of the quotient bundle. I mean if there is always a line bundle embeded in the given complex vector bundle, we can just split it on the original vector bundle, every time we take quotient of these two bundle, we get a quotient bundle with dimensional reduced by 1. So in the similar way we can conclude that every bundle can be decomposed into the direct sum of several line bundle. So is it true? Can we always find a line bundle embedded into a given complex vector bundle?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ As a help for other people working on this question: The context is $C^{\infty}$ vector bundles on smooth manifolds. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 7, 2020 at 12:10
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ A (complex) line bundle over $X$ is determined by its first Chern class in $H^2(X)$. In particular, if $H^2(X)=0$, then every line bundle over $X$ is trivial. On the other hand, such $X$ can admit a nontrivial complex vector bundle, e.g. if $\pi_i(U(n))$ is nontrivial, there is a nontrivial $\mathbb C^n$-bunlde over $S^{i+1}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 7, 2020 at 12:27

2 Answers 2

36
$\begingroup$

No, this is not true. Consider the tangent bundle to $\mathbb{CP}^2$; I claim it does not contain a sublinebundle. Let $h$ be the class of a hyperplane in $H^2(\mathbb{CP}^2)$. So $H^{\ast}(\mathbb{CP}^2) \cong \mathbb{Z}[h]/h^3$. Here are two proofs (which are really the same proof in two languages).

Proof one: Chern classes The total Chern class of the tangent bundle is $1+3h + 3 h^2$. If we had a short exact sequence $0 \to L_1 \to T \to L_2 \to 0$, then we would have $c(L_1) c(L_2) = 1+3h+3h^2$. But the polynomial $1+3x+3x^2$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}$. $\square$

Proof two: a bundle with no section The projectivation of the tangent bundle is the flag manifold $\mathcal{F}\ell_3$. Choosing a sublinebundle of $T$ corresponds to choosing a (continuous) section of the bundle $\mathcal{F}\ell_3 \to \mathbb{CP}^2$. We have $H^{\ast}(\mathcal{F}\ell_3) \cong H^{\ast}(\mathbb{CP}^2)[u]/(u^2+3hu+3h^2)$. If we had a section, this would induce a map from $H^{\ast}(\mathcal{F}\ell_3)$ to $H^{\ast}(\mathbb{CP}^2)$ which would be the identity on $H^{\ast}(\mathbb{CP}^2)$ and would have to send $u$ to $kh$ for some integer $k$. But then we would have $k^2+3k+3=0$, and this polynomial does not have integer roots. $\square$

I think of the bundle $\mathcal{F}\ell_3 \to \mathbb{CP}^2$ as a complex analogue of the Hopf fibration, which likewise has no continuous section, although I don't know a way to make this precise. This answer is the analogue of the Hairy Ball theorem, which basically says that the tangent bundle to $S^2$ doesn't have a real sublinebundle.

$\endgroup$
0
8
$\begingroup$

I think thinking in terms of classifying spaces will help clarify the situation. We know that a rank $n$ complex vector bundle $V$ on $X$ is the same thing as a homotopy class of maps $f:X\to BU_n$. A choice of decomposition $V\cong L\oplus W$ where $L$ is a line bundle corresponds to a lift of $f$ to $B(U_1\times U_{n-1})\cong BU_1\times BU_{n-1}$. The homotopy fiber of the map $BU_1\times BU_{n-1}\to BU_n$ is $U_n/(U_1\times U_{n-1})\cong \mathbb{CP}^{n-1}$. This is a non-trivial principal fibration and so it has no section.

In particular you can take the universal vector bundle on $BU_n$ (or if you want, its restriction to some finite skeleton given by a suitable complex Grassmannian) and this will give you a vector bundle that admits no line bundle.

Note that $BU_1\times BU_{n-1}$ is precisely the projectivization of the universal vector bundle on $BU_n$, so this is just another way of phrasing the splitting principle.

More precisely you can find a sequence of obstructions in $H^{i+1}(X;\pi_i\mathbb{CP}^{n-1})$ for $i\ge2$ and you can find a sub-line bundle if and only if these obstruction vanish. For example you can always find a such a line bundle if the (cohomological) dimension $X$ is less or equal than 2

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that my answer is precisely the finite skeleton Denis mentions: $BU_2 \cong G(2,\infty)$, where as I work with $G(2,3) \cong \mathbb{CP}^2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 8, 2020 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidESpeyer Corrected, thank you! $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 8, 2020 at 12:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice answer! So, presumably, the answer I gave was the obstruction in $H^4(X, \pi_3 \mathbb{CP}^1)$. Sure enough, the nonzero class in $\pi_3(\mathbb{CP}^1)$ comes from the Hopf fibration. This suggests I should be able to make an example where the obstruction comes from $H^3(X, \pi_2(\mathbb{CP}^1))$. This would be fun to try. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 8, 2020 at 15:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidESpeyer I don't believe any such example exists. If there were such an X with non-trivial obstruction, then this obstruction would persist on the 3-skeleton of X. So we might as well assume X is a 3-dimensional CW complex. But then by cellular approximation any map from X to BU(2) factors through the 3-skeleton of BU(2), which happens to also be the 2-skeleton $\mathbb{CP}^1$. However the universal bundle already splits into two lines when restricted to $\mathbb{CP}^1$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2020 at 20:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .