8
$\begingroup$

Is there a general formula for the number of unramified quadratic extensions of a number field $K$?

When $K$ is quadratic, this is known (by genus theory) to be $2^{\omega(\Delta_K)-1}$, where $\omega(n)$ denotes the number of distinct prime factors of $n$ and $\Delta_K$ is the discriminant of $K$. I'm interested in results for when $K$ is of higher degree.

It seems like this problem might be much harder and is maybe adjacent to understanding the two-torsion of the class group $\text{Cl}_K$ (which seems hard when $K$ is not quadratic), but I'm pretty new to the area and could be totally off-base. Is there any hope of a more direct approach?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "is maybe adjacent": it is in fact completely equivalent. $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Aug 20, 2020 at 8:59
  • $\begingroup$ The unramified abelian extensions of $K$ are in bijection with the subgroups of $\text{Cl}_K$. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Aug 20, 2020 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ @abx In particular, it is "maybe adjacent". $\endgroup$
    – R.P.
    Commented Aug 20, 2020 at 9:17
  • $\begingroup$ @GHfromMO I agree, by HIlbert Class Field I guess. $\endgroup$
    – bean
    Commented Aug 20, 2020 at 9:22
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @bean However, #A[2] equals #Hom(A,Z/2Z) by duality. $\endgroup$
    – R.P.
    Commented Aug 20, 2020 at 9:39

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

The answer seems to be no.

  1. The number of unramified quadratic extensions of $K$ is equal to the number of index-two subgroups of the ideal class group $\text{Cl}_K$ by class field theory.
  2. The index-two subgroups of $\text{Cl}_K$ correspond to the non-zero elements of $\text{Hom}(\text{Cl}_K, \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z})$.
  3. $\#\text{Hom}(\text{Cl}_K, \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}) = \#\text{Cl}_K[2]$ by Pontryagin duality, as pointed out to me by @RP_ and @abx in the comments.
  4. The problem of computing (or even bounding) the size of $\#\text{Cl}_K[2]$ when $K$ is not a quadratic extension appears to be under active study and seems to be a challenging problem in general.
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .