1
$\begingroup$

Let $Q_1(x_0, x_1, x_2), Q_2(x_0, x_1, x_2) \in \mathbb{Z}[x_0, x_1, x_2]$ be two primitive, non-singular ternary quadratic forms (possibly indefinite). Suppose we want to solve the simultaneous equations

$$\displaystyle u_1 = Q_1(x_0, x_1, x_2), u_2 = Q_2(x_0, x_1, x_2), u_1, u_2 \in \mathbb{Z}, \gcd(x_0, x_1, x_2) = 1.$$

Then according to this paper, a theorem of Mordell states that the solutions can be found as follows: first consider the conic defined by

$$\displaystyle C_{u_1,u_2} : Q_{u_1, u_2}(x_0, x_1, x_2) = u_1 Q_2(x_0, x_1, x_2) - u_2 Q_1(x_0, x_1, x_2) = 0.$$

If there is a solution at all, this conic must have a rational point, which can be detected using the local-to-global principle. Having found a rational point, one can then use the "slope/intersect" trick to produce a parametrization. That is, draw lines emanating from a global point which must exist by Hasse's principle: this line will intersect the conic at another rational point and this sweeps out all of the rational points on the conic. This produces binary quadratic forms $f_0(u,v), f_1(u,v), f_2(u,v)$ so that the conic $C_{u_1,u_2}$ is exactly parametrized by $z_i = f_i(u,v), i = 0,1,2$.

One then inserts these quadratic forms into $Q_1, Q_2$, producing binary quartic forms, and then solve the two Thue equations given by $u_i = Q_i(f_0(u,v), f_1(u,v), f_2(u,v))$.

What I am not quite sure is the number of parametrizations. That is, there could be inequivalent triples of quadratic forms $(f_0, f_1, f_2)$ which parametrize the points on $C_{u_1, u_2}$. How do we bound the number of distinct parametrizations?

$\endgroup$
3

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Part of this is finding the primitive integer null vectors of an indefinite ternary quadratic form $f(x,y,z).$ Mordell points out that these occur in a finite number of parametrizations. The process you mention, stereographic projection around a rational point, does not do a good job of finding primitive integral solutions. Instead, it immediately finds all rational solutions, with no bound on denominators.

The Hessian matrix $H$ of an isotropic ternary form has this feature: there is an integer matrix $P$ and an integer $n$ such that $$ P^T HP = nG \; , $$ where $G$ is the Hessian matrix of $g(x,y,z) = y^2 - zx \; . \;$ Indeed, there are infinitely of these. For a fixed $n,$ there are typically several such $P$ if any.

Let's see, the primitive null vectors of $y^2 - zx$ are precisely $(p^2,pq,q^2).$ Applying $P$ to this (as a column vector) gives a null vector for $H,$ and we get some ability to say when this will be primitive.

I worked this out for isotropic forms of the sort $A(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) - B(yz+zx+xy).$ The number of inequivalent $P$ matrices needed to produce all primitive null vectors can be arbitrarily large. I kept a list somewhere...

The original proof is in Fricke and Klein (1897), where it is mentioned in passing. Different versions have been published over the years. I eventually wrote down a proof using just matrices, gcd and the like.

The twelve matrices $P$ needed for $$ 100(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) -541(yz + zx + xy) =0 $$ This includes something about the order of the (very symmetric) solutions.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 A = 100       B = 541

    445   1009    430
    430   -149   -134
   -134   -119    445

    478   1003    394
    394   -215   -131
   -131    -47    478

    514    985    349
    349   -287   -122
   -122     43    514

    529    973    328
    328   -317   -116
   -116     85    529

    541    961    310
    310   -341   -110
   -110    121    541

    574    913    253
    253   -407    -86
    -86    235    574

    580    901    241
    241   -419    -80
    -80    259    580

    604    835    184
    184   -467    -47
    -47    373    604

    610    811    166
    166   -479    -35
    -35    409    610

    616    781    145
    145   -491    -20
    -20    451    616

    625    709    100
    100   -509     16
     16    541    625

    628    643     64
     64   -515     49
     49    613    628


   count was  12     end of  A = 100       B = 541
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

my proof

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That there can be arbitrarily many different parametrizations does not surprise me, but I am wondering whether one can obtain a divisor like bound for the number of them. I believe in such a case one can relate the number of parametrizations to the 2-torsion part of the class group of some quadratic order associated with the pair of forms and integers? $\endgroup$ Jun 16, 2020 at 11:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.