We can obtain an explicit upper bound using the identity (where $p$ is restricted to primes)
$$\frac{n}{\phi(n)}=\prod_{p\mid n}\left(1+\frac{1}{p-1}\right)=\sum_{d\mid n}\frac{\mu^2(d)}{\phi(d)}.$$
For $X\geq 1$, the above identity implies that
\begin{align*}\sum_{n\leq X}\frac{\tau_k(n)}{\phi(n)}
&=\sum_{n\leq X}\frac{\tau_k(n)}{n}\sum_{d\mid n}\frac{\mu^2(d)}{\phi(d)}\\
&=\sum_{d\leq X}\frac{\mu^2(d)}{\phi(d)}
\sum_{m\leq X/d}\frac{\tau_k(dm)}{dm}\\
&\leq\sum_{d\leq X}\frac{\mu^2(d)\tau_k(d)}{d\phi(d)}
\sum_{m\leq X/d}\frac{\tau_k(m)}{m}\\
&<\left(\sum_{d=1}^\infty\frac{\mu^2(d)\tau_k(d)}{d\phi(d)}\right)
\left(\sum_{m\leq X}\frac{\tau_k(m)}{m}\right).
\end{align*}
On the right hand side,
\begin{align*}\sum_{d=1}^\infty\frac{\mu^2(d)\tau_k(d)}{d\phi(d)}
&=\prod_p\left(1+\frac{k}{p(p-1)}\right)\\
&\leq\prod_p\left(1+\frac{1}{p(p-1)}\right)^k\\
&=\left(\prod_p\frac{1-p^{-6}}{(1-p^{-2})(1-p^{-3})}\right)^k\\
&=\left(\frac{\zeta(2)\zeta(3)}{\zeta(6)}\right)^k,
\end{align*}
while it is straightforward that
$$\sum_{m\leq X}\frac{\tau_k(m)}{m}\leq
\left(\sum_{m\leq X}\frac{1}{m}\right)^k\leq (1+\log X)^k.$$
We conclude that
$$\sum_{n\leq X}\frac{\tau_k(n)}{\phi(n)}<\left(\frac{\zeta(2)\zeta(3)}{\zeta(6)}\right)^k(1+\log X)^k.$$
P.S. Of course many other approaches are available and an asymptotic formula can also be proved. My goal was to give a fully explicit upper bound.