I am interested in seeing examples of two closed 4-manifolds $X_1,X_2$ such that $SW(X_i)=0$ and they are homeomorphic but not diffeomorphic.

So far in the literature I've only found examples which somehow used symplectic geometry and operations on the Seiberg-Witten invariant (knot surgery, rational blow down, star surgery, etc.) to distinguish one from the other. So I am interested in knowing some other (if known) techniques in this direction. The reason I've mentioned $SW(X_i)=0$ is to ensure that none of them admits symplectic structures (by work of Taubes). Trisection theory is potentially a way but I am not sure if anything is known in that direction or not. Thanks in advance.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ These may not be the spirit of examples you're looking for, but you can produce examples using connected sums. See, for example, Ishida-Sasahira. The point is that Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish under connected sums of 4-manifolds with $b^+_2 \geq 1$, but this isn't true of the stronger Bauer-Furuta invariants. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Hayden May 20 at 21:02

$\mathbb CP^2\#\overline{K3}$ (trivial SW because it is a connected sum with $b^2_+>0$ for both pieces). This is an example without having to use the Bauer-Furuta invariants (contrast with Kyle's comment), but with the SW invariants of the 4-manifold's opposite (reverse $X$'s orientation into $\overline X$). I learned this example from Tim Perutz at some point: The symplectic manifold $X=K3\#\overline{\mathbb CP^2}$ has $b^2_+=3$ and $b^2_-=20$ and $b^1=0$ and nontrivial SW invariants (note that $b^2_++b^1+1$ is even, this quantity is the parity of the various SW moduli spaces and needs to be even for the ordinary SW invariants to possibly be nontrivial). By doing Fintushel-Stern knot surgery on K3 we get exotic copies $X_K$ (knot $K$) distinguished by the SW invariants. Then $SW(\overline X_K)=0$ because $b^2_+(\overline X_K)+b^1(\overline X_K)+1=21$ is odd, with each $\overline X_K$ homeomorphic to the non-symplectic $\overline{K3}\#\mathbb CP^2$. So the "technique" of orientation-reversal should be added to our arsenal -- related discussion is found in Draghici's paper "Seiberg-Witten invariants when reversing orientation" and its references, for example.

More interestingly (perhaps), Taubes studied a possibly infinite set (if not all diffeomorphic) of smooth 4-manifolds $\lbrace X_K\rbrace_K$ all homeomorphic to the non-symplectic $3\mathbb CP^2\#23\overline{\mathbb CP^2}$, obtained from knot surgery on K3 using different hyperbolic knots $K\subset S^3$. They all have vanishing SW invariants (and vanishing Bauer-Furuta invariants). But it is not known whether they are all diffeomorphic... if they are then there are some interesting properties of ASD Weyl curvature metrics on it!

  • $\begingroup$ Interesting!! Thank you for sharing :) $\endgroup$ – Anubhav Mukherjee May 22 at 3:01
  • $\begingroup$ One thing is not clear to me, why $\bar{X_K}$ and $\bar{K3} # \mathbb CP^2$ are not diffeomorphic? i.e if X and Y are diffeomorphic does that mean $\bar{X}$ and $\bar{Y}$ are diffeomorphic? $\endgroup$ – Anubhav Mukherjee May 22 at 3:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, using the same diffeomorphism (pick your favorite definition of orientation and check). $\endgroup$ – Chris Gerig May 22 at 5:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.