5
$\begingroup$

Let $u$ be a measure sequence derived from some embedding $j:V\rightarrow M$. I heard that from iterating $j$ is possible to define a generic filter for some Radin forcing $\mathbb{R}_w$. Specifically, $\mathbb{R}_w$ is the Radin forcing defined using the measure sequence $w=j_{\alpha}(u)$, where $j_\alpha$ is the $\alpha^{th}$-iterated of $j$.

My question is the following: Which are the measures that we use to carry out this process? Are the second coordinates (i.e. $u_\gamma(1)$) of the corresponding measure sequence $u_\gamma$? Are the whole measure sequences $u_\gamma$? In this latter case, how looks like the definition of a ultrapower given by a measure sequence $u_\gamma$?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

See section 5 (called "Generating generic sequences by iterating j") of Radin's paper Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals.

More details: The iteration is the usual one, using $j$ (see my comment below). Now the point is that is $u$ is the measure sequence in $V$, then there is $\sigma: ORD \to V$ so that $\sigma(\alpha)=j_{0, \alpha}(u)\restriction \beta_\alpha,$ for some suitable $\beta_\alpha$ and such that for any $\alpha, \sigma \restriction \alpha+1$ is $\mathbb{R}_{\sigma(\alpha)}$-generic over $M_\alpha$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reference! Anyway I'm still having some doubts on it. I may understand that if $j:V\rightarrow M$ is an elementary embedding then what we are iterating not the measures $u_\gamma(1)$ but the extender generating $j$. More precisely, if $j:V\rightarrow M_1$ is generated by $E$ then $V$ thinks $u$ is generated by $E$, hence $M$ thinks that $j(u)$ is generated by $j(E)$. Now as $M_2$ we take the ultrapower of $M_1$ by the extender $j(E)$ so that $M_2$ thinks $j_{2}(u)$ is generated by $j_2(E)$. Does it make sense? Thank you in advance! $\endgroup$ – Cesare Apr 4 at 8:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The iteration by j may be considered by applying j at successor steps $(j_{0,\alpha+1}=j(j_{0,\alpha}) \circ j)$, and taking direct limits at limit ordinals $\endgroup$ – Mohammad Golshani Apr 7 at 1:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.