2
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbf{M}$ be a submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with the induced Euclidean metric, and $\mbox{Ricc} \geq - \kappa , \kappa \geq 0$, as well as diameter bounded by $D$.

What is the best known bound on the Poincare constant of $\mathbf{M}$? To be completely precise, what is the smallest $C$, s.t. for all smooth $f: \mathbf{M} \to \mathbb{R}$, $$\mbox{var}_{\mu}(f) \leq C \mathbb{E}_{\mu} \|\nabla f\|^2$$ where $\mu$ is the uniform distribution over $\mathbf{M}$.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The optimal (in terms of diameter $D$) Sobolev-Poincare inequality for manifolds with Ricci bounded below was proved by P. Maheux, L. Saloff-Coste. From the Sobolev-Poincare inequality and Holder's inequality you can deduce Poincare inequality. For details see: https://mathoverflow.net/a/321012/121665. I hope it helps.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Is this known to be tight? In particular, is it know the dependence on $\kappa$ and $D$ needs to be exponential? $\endgroup$
    – Andy Mack
    Commented Feb 1, 2019 at 20:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AndyMack I do not know examples showing sharpness of the inequality, but as far as I know this is the best inequality known. I would suggest to search who quoted the paper of Maheux and Saloff-Coste to see if there are better results. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 1, 2019 at 20:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the exponential dependence might be realized for hyperbolic manifolds. $\endgroup$
    – Deane Yang
    Commented Feb 1, 2019 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ @DeaneYang: I don't quite see this (though I'm a newbie). Is it possible to do the calculation explicitly or something in this case? $\endgroup$
    – Andy Mack
    Commented Feb 1, 2019 at 22:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .