0
$\begingroup$

This was asked a long time ago on math.stackexchange with no answers.

Let $f:\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}.$ Assume that the support of $f$ is finite, say it is $[1,N],$ and that $\mid f\mid$ is bounded (as well as being nonzero at each point in its support if necessary). Define the fourier transform $$\widehat{f}:[0,1)\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$$ by $$\widehat{f(t)}=\sum_{n\in \mathbb{Z}} f(n)~e^{2i \pi n t}.$$

Parseval states that $$ \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \mid f(n) \mid^2 = \int_0^1 \mid\widehat{f(t)} \mid^2 \,dt $$ holds. Now let $v$ be a positive integer $\geq 2,$ and let the "sampled" function be $$ f_v(n)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ccc} f(n), & \quad\mathrm{if}\quad & v|n,\\ & & \\ 0 & & \mathrm{otherwise}. \end{array} \right. $$ Let $f=f_1$ for simplicity. What is the Parseval relationship for this function, as expressed in terms of the transform of the original function?

Due to the comb structure, one will have a `sinc' structure for the transform, and the comb can be truncated to the support $[1,N],$ which can presumably be used together with the convolution theorem in the frequency domain.

What I am really interested in, however, is estimating from below, the following quantity $$ \sum_{v=1}^m \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \mid f_v(n) \mid^2 = \sum_{v=1}^m \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \mid \mathbb{1}\{n\!\!\pmod v=0~\}|^2 \mid f(n)\mid^2= $$ $$ =\sum_{v=1}^m \int_0^1 \mid \widehat{\Phi_v(t-t')} \mid^2 \mid\widehat{f(t')} \mid^2 \,dt' \geq $$ $$ \stackrel{hopefully}{\geq} A(N,m) \int_0^1 \mid\widehat{f(t')} \mid^2 \,dt' $$ using some kind of uncertainty relation. Here, $\widehat{\Phi_v(t)}$ is the fourier transform of the comb, i.e., the sinc type function.

We can take $m\ll N,$ a fractional power of $N$ or even a power of $\log N.$

Edit: Let $|f|>0,$ on $[1,N]$. and can even take it to be essentially constant in magnitude if it helps.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Isn't there a problem with your derivation near the end? The $L^2$ norm of the convolution $\widehat{\Phi_v} * \widehat{f}$ is not the integral you wrote. For $m \ll N$, if you take $f$ to be supported only at $f(1) = 1$ and $f(\mathrm{lcm}(\{1, \ldots, m\})+1) = 1$ and zero otherwise. The trivial lower bound of $A = 1$ seems to be sharp. So presumably you are more interested in when $m$ is large enough that $f_v$ has to be mostly non-trivial? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2019 at 15:53
  • $\begingroup$ We can assume $f$ takes values on the unit circle and even that $supp~ f=[1,N].$ $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Commented Jan 24, 2019 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ If you assume $f$ is almost constant in magnitude, then pretty much all the $f(n)$ terms that appear in the summation can be replaced by $1$, no? Then the "combed" sum would be basically $\sum_{v = 1}^m N/v$ which shouldn't be too hard to estimate from below. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 24, 2019 at 22:27
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry $|f|$ is almost constant, but $f$ is not. $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Commented Jan 24, 2019 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ but that doesn't matter for the $L^2$ estimates. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2019 at 16:28

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If one were to assume $|f|$ is almost constant on its support, then a rough estimate is available.

Assume for now $|f| = 1$ on its support. Similar argument can be made if we know that there exists some $C>0$ such that $C \inf_{n\in \{1, \ldots, N\}} |f(n)| \geq \sup_{n \in \{1, \ldots, N\}} |f(n)|$.

In the case $|f| = 1$ on its support, the sum of $\ell_2$ norms that the OP is interested becomes

$$ \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \underbrace{\lfloor \frac{N}{\nu} \rfloor}_{= \|f_\nu\|_2^2} $$

which by elementary inequalities gives

$$ N \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \frac{1}{\nu} \geq \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \lfloor \frac{N}{\nu} \rfloor \geq N \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \frac{1}{\nu} - m $$

The sum $\sum_{\nu = 1}^m \frac{1}{\nu}$ is the $n$th Harmonic number about which much is known. For a very rough estimate we have it is bounded

$$ \ln(m) + 1 \geq \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \frac{1}{\nu} \geq \ln(m) $$

So you get

$$ N \ln(m) + N \geq \sum_{\nu = 1}^m \lfloor \frac{N}{\nu} \rfloor \geq N \ln(m) - m $$

As you want to compare this to $\| f\|_{2}^2 = N$ in this case, you see that a very naive bound of

$$ A(N,m) \geq \ln(m) - \frac{m}{N} $$

would work. This can of course be sharpened using better estimates of the Harmonic numbers.

In the case you have $C > 1$, you see that the same argument leads to $A(N,m) \geq \frac1{C^2} (\ln(m) - \frac{m}{N})$ as a rough estimate. Of course, as I mentioned in the comments, there is the trivial lower bound of $A(N,m) \geq 1$, which seems sharp as $C \nearrow \infty$, at least when $m \ll N$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .