1
$\begingroup$

Let $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ be three different mutually orthogonal random hermitian operators, say dimension of $30\times 30$. For three random real numbers $a_1$, $a_2$, $a_3$, we have $$ (a_1A_1+a_2A_2+a_3A_3)\vec{v}=s\vec{v}. $$ i.e., $\vec{v}$ is an eigenvectors of the matrix $a_1A_1+a_2A_2+a_3A_3$ with eigenvalue $s$. We ask if there exists another set of real numbers $(a_1',a_2',a_3',s')$ such that $$ (a_1'A_1+a_2'A_2+a_3'A_3)\vec{v}=s'\vec{v}. $$ generically.

I have numerically verified that the $(a_1,a_2,a_3,s)$ is unique generically. Now in a more general setting, the number of random hermitian operators of size $d\times d$ is $r$. We ask if $(a_i,s)$ is unique for certain $\vec{v}$ when $r=O(d)$. Is there any mathematical theorem which guarantte this?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Of course it's not unique: you can multiply $(a_1, a_2, a_3, s)$ by the same scalar. Generically, that will be all, i.e. the span of $A_1 v$, $A_2 v$, $A_3 v$ and $v$ will have dimension $3$. $\endgroup$ Oct 25 '18 at 1:54
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertIsrael Is there any rigorous proof that the span of $A_1v$, $A_2 v$, $A_3v$ and $v$ will have dimension 3? $\endgroup$
    – Sirui Lu
    Oct 25 '18 at 2:37
1
$\begingroup$

Given a non-zero vector $v$, let $V(v)=\{ H | \exists \lambda: Hv=\lambda v \}$ be the space of all Hermitian matrices for which $v$ is an eigenvector.

It is clear that this space is conjugate (under a unitary conjugation) to $V(e_1)$ where $e_1=(1,0,\dots,0)$ is the standard vector. From this it follows that $V(v)$ has codimension $n-1$ and is a linear subspace of codimension $n-1$ in the space $W$ of Hermitian matrices.

Now, we can reduce the problem to the following problem in "linear algebra".

Problem: Given a subspace $V$ of codimension $k$ a vector space $W$, consider the collection $C$ of all $r$-tuples $(A_1,\dots,A_r)$ in $W$ such that their linear span has a non-zero intersection with $V$. For a general element of $C$ what is the dimension of this intersection?

When $r\geq k$, the answer is 1. When $r<k$, the answer is $k-r$.

Applying this to the above example shows that if $n>4$, then for a general triple $(A_1,A_2,A_3)$ of Hermitian matrices of size $n$, a vector $v$ which is an eigenvector of a general (real) linear combination $a_1A_1+a_2A_2+a_3A_3$ is not an eigenvector any other linear combination except a scalar multiple.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.