7
$\begingroup$

Cross-posted from Math SE because I felt like it might be too obscure for there. I'm sorry if this is the wrong place for it.

EDIT: This question now has an answer over there


The finite-dimension division algebras over the reals are:

  • $\Bbb R$: the reals (dimension 1)
  • $\Bbb C$: the complex numbers (dimension 2)
  • $\Bbb H$: the quaternions (dimension 4)
  • $\Bbb O$: the octonions (dimension 8)
  • some other things of dimension 2, 4, and 8

An example of a dimension-2 division algebra other that $\Bbb C$ is $(\Bbb C,*)$ with $a*b:=\overline{ab}$ (that is, the complex conjugate of the usual multiplication). This gives you $1*1=1$, $1*i=i*1=-i$, and $i*i=-1$. You'll notice that $1*a$ does not necessarily equal $a$; that is, this algebra is not unital. There exist nonunital division algebras of dimension 8 as well.

Are there any unital division algebras of dimension 8 (other than $\Bbb O$)? Such an algebra cannot be alternative, nor can it have a norm (as each of these, together with the dimension 8 condition, uniquely define the octonions).

(EDIT: The nonunital algebra defined above has a norm, but the only unital normed algebras are $\Bbb R$, $\Bbb C$, $\Bbb H$, and $\Bbb O$.)

Strangely, I haven't been able to find a source one way or another online, which is weird because it seems like it would close up the search for real division algebras. So, does such a thing exist?

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ This does not answer your question, but evidently there are examples over finite fields. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/… $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 0:41
  • $\begingroup$ It occurs to me that I should have written some other dimension 2, dimension 4, and dimension 8 things in that last bullet point since $a*b=\overline{ab}$ generalizes to the quaternions as well. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 5:07
  • $\begingroup$ What about dimension 4? Is it known? $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 6:18
  • $\begingroup$ @abx You know, I assumed nonassociative implies dimension 8, but I guess that might not actually be true. (Associative implies $\Bbb R$, $\Bbb C$, or $\Bbb H$, with or without the unital condition, at least according to Wikipedia.) If someone presented a unital dimension 4 division algebra other than $\Bbb H$ I'd accept it as an answer also. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 6:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In general, a division algebra satisfies that the equations $xz = y$ and $z'x = y$ always has a solution for any nonzero $x$. For alternative algebras this implies the existence of a unit, but in general it doesn't. $\endgroup$
    – arsmath
    Commented Sep 9, 2018 at 11:16

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The answer on math.SE points to a construction that produces an algebra of the desired type. (But maybe not all of them?) Here is a different kind of answer: There are uncountably many isomorphism classes of unital division algebras of dimension $n = 4$ or 8. Of course, only a single one of these is $\mathbb{H}$ or $\mathbb{O}$, so really there are a profusion of other ones out there.

I’ll point out the exact spot in the argument where the hypothesis that $n = 4$ or 8 gets used.

Consider the space of possible algebra structures on $\mathbb{R}^n$. What does it look like? We need to specify the multiplication, which is an element of the vector space $\mathbb{R}^n \otimes (\mathbb{R}^n)^* \otimes (\mathbb{R}^n)^*$, so that is the space of all algebra structures. But we also want the algebra to be unital. Given a unital multiplication on $\mathbb{R}^n$, we could do a change of basis to make the identity element $e$ the first basis vector. A multiplication with that property is an element of the vector space $$ \mathcal{A} := \mathbb{R}^n \otimes (\mathbb{R}^{n-1})^* \otimes (\mathbb{R}^{n-1})^*. $$ In summary, every element of $\mathcal{A}$ specifies a unital algebra structure on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with $e$ as identity, and every such algebra arises in this way. Note that $$ \dim \mathcal{A} = n(n-1)^2. $$

Inside this vector space, define $\mathcal{D}$ to be the subset consisting of multiplications that define division algebras. There is a geometric argument in section 5 of

that shows that $\mathcal{D}$ is an open subset of $\mathcal{A}$. Now, since $n = 4$ or 8, $\mathcal{D}$ is not empty (because it contains $\mathbb{H}$ or $\mathbb{O}$), therefore we have: $$ \dim \mathcal{D} = \dim \mathcal{A}. $$

Next, let $P$ denote the subgroup of $GL_n(\mathbb{R})$ that fixes the first basis vector $e$. We have $$ dim P = n(n-1), $$ because it is the collection of invertible matrices whose first column is the transpose of $(1, 0, \ldots, 0)$. Let $P$ act on $\mathcal{A}$ as $GL_n(\mathbb{R})$ naturally does, i.e., for $p \in P$, $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$, and $a, b \in (\mathbb{R}^{n-1})^*$: $$ p(x \otimes a \otimes b) = px \otimes ap^{-1} \otimes bp^{-1}. $$ Then $P$-orbits in $\mathcal{A}$ are exactly isomorphism classes of unital multiplications on $\mathbb{R}^n$ where the first basis vector is the identity.

Finally, let’s look at the orbit space $\mathcal{D} / P$. It parameterizes the isomorphism classes of the desired kinds of algebras. It has dimension $$ \dim \mathcal{D}/P \ge \dim \mathcal{D} - \dim P = n(n-1)^2 - n(n-1) = n(n-1)(n-2). $$ Since $n > 2$, this dimension is positive, so $\mathcal{D} / P$ has uncountably many points.

Definitions for reference

Because there are many similar-sounding results in the area based on different hypotheses, here are a few definitions that are used in this answer.

  • A (real) algebra is a real vector space $A$ together with an $\mathbb{R}$-bilinear map $A \times A \to A$ that we call multiplication.
  • The algebra is unital if there exists an element $e \in A$ such that $ea = ae = a$ for all $a \in A.$
  • It is a division algebra if and only if, for every nonzero $x \in A$, the left multiplication map $L_x: A \to A$ defined by $L_x(y) = xy$ is invertible. (Usually the definition includes also that right multiplication by $x$ is also an invertible, but that is redundant since we are assuming that $A$ is finite-dimensional. Indeed, if right multiplication by a nonzero $x$ is not invertible, then there is a nonzero $y$ such that $yx = 0$, in which case left multiplication by $y$ is not invertible.)

Remarks

  • This argument is essentially straight from Petersson’s paper, but with a few details changed to apply it to the question being posed. Petersson proves that there are uncountably many division algebras of dimension 4 or 8 up to isotopy (a weaker/coarser equivalence relation than isomorphism).
  • I have heard studying the topology of $\mathcal{A}$ and similar spaces referred to by the charming name “algebraic geography”.
  • If anyone who comes across this question is interested in the 2-dimensional case, my favorite reference for that case is
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What a beautiful argument! I'll admit that I fully forgot I asked this question, but thinking of an entire algebra as being just a single tensor is genius. It seems to me that the fact that $\cal D$ is open in $\cal A$ is the key idea in this argument. My intuition tells me that it should follow from some compactness shenanigans. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! You are right about the compactness. You choose a metric on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and consider the unit sphere $S$ in that metric. For each division algebra $d \in \mathcal{D}$ and $s \in S$ you can talk about $\det L_s$ where $L_s$ is left multiplication by $s$ in $d$. The image of ${d} \times S$ is compact in $\mathbb{R} \setminus \{ 0 \}$, so it is closed and bounded away from 0. Because $\det L$ is continuous in $d$, there is an open nbhd of $d$ consisting of other algebras $d'$ such that ${d'} \times S$ has image also missing 0. Each of those algebras $d'$ is a division algebra. $\endgroup$
    – Skip
    Commented Jul 31 at 3:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .