Timeline for Unital nonalternative real division algebras of dimension 8
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 29 at 18:19 | vote | accept | Akiva Weinberger | ||
Jul 29 at 0:49 | answer | added | Skip | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 29 at 0:35 | history | edited | Skip | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
Sep 9, 2018 at 11:16 | comment | added | arsmath | In general, a division algebra satisfies that the equations $xz = y$ and $z'x = y$ always has a solution for any nonzero $x$. For alternative algebras this implies the existence of a unit, but in general it doesn't. | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 11:11 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | @arsmath I don't have much experience with nonalternative algebras, but 1*a=a seemed pretty reasonable to me | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 11:10 | comment | added | arsmath | Why would it close up the search? "Unital" is not a natural property for non-alternative algebras. | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 9:53 | history | edited | Akiva Weinberger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
Sep 9, 2018 at 9:16 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | This looks like it answers it | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 9:02 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | I wonder if analyzing linearly independent vector fields on spheres will help us find, or prove the nonexistence of, such an algebra? (I know you can go the other way, that is, use algebras to find linearly independent vector fields on spheres.) | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 6:24 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | Also, Wikipedia doesn't seem to be consistent between unital and unitary. | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 6:23 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | @abx You know, I assumed nonassociative implies dimension 8, but I guess that might not actually be true. (Associative implies $\Bbb R$, $\Bbb C$, or $\Bbb H$, with or without the unital condition, at least according to Wikipedia.) If someone presented a unital dimension 4 division algebra other than $\Bbb H$ I'd accept it as an answer also. | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 6:18 | comment | added | abx | What about dimension 4? Is it known? | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 5:31 | history | edited | Akiva Weinberger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 143 characters in body
|
Sep 9, 2018 at 5:26 | history | edited | Akiva Weinberger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
Sep 9, 2018 at 5:07 | comment | added | Akiva Weinberger | It occurs to me that I should have written some other dimension 2, dimension 4, and dimension 8 things in that last bullet point since $a*b=\overline{ab}$ generalizes to the quaternions as well. | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 5:01 | history | edited | Akiva Weinberger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Sep 9, 2018 at 0:41 | comment | added | John Wayland Bales | This does not answer your question, but evidently there are examples over finite fields. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/… | |
Sep 9, 2018 at 0:25 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 9, 2018 at 0:26 | |||||
Sep 9, 2018 at 0:23 | history | asked | Akiva Weinberger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |