2
$\begingroup$

I find myself in the following situation:

Let $(\mathcal{F}_i, f_{i,j})$ be a directed system of sheaves, defined on an exhausting family of closed topological subspaces $$X_i \subset X_{i+1} \subset ... \subset X$$.

Suppose that we know how the limit of restrictions $$\underset{j}{\lim} \iota_{i,j}^* \mathcal{F}_j, \quad i \leq j$$ looks on each subset $X_i$, where $\iota_{j,i} : X_j \hookrightarrow X_i$ is the closed inclusion (so the maps defining the limit process look something like the composition $\iota_{i,j}^* f_{i,j}$).

Is it enough to know the whole limit sheaf $$\mathcal{F} := \underset{i}{\lim}\mathcal{F}_i ?$$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Is $\mathcal F_i$ a sheaf on $X$ or a sheaf on $X_i$? $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathcal{F}_i$ is a sheaf on $X_i$, that's the problem $\endgroup$
    – BrianT
    Aug 27, 2018 at 12:49
  • $\begingroup$ When you say "exhausting", do you simply mean that the $X$ is the union of the point sets $X_i$, or are you assuming that as a topological space $X$ is the direct limit of $X_i$? $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ Don't the inclusions $X_i \subset X_j$, $i \leq j$ imply that the direct limit is the union ? If not, then sorry for my lack of precision. I assume that the space $X$ is the direct limit of $X_i$. $\endgroup$
    – BrianT
    Aug 27, 2018 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ That is, the direct limit in the category of topological spaces. So that a set in $X$ is open (or closed) iff for each $i$ its intersection with $X_i$ is open (or closed) in $X_i$. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2018 at 13:57

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.