11
$\begingroup$

Say that two triangles are incommensurate if they do not share an edge length or a vertex angle, and their areas differ. Suppose you'd like to tile the plane with pairwise incommensurate triangles. I can think of at least one strategy.

Spiral out from an initial triangle in the pattern depicted below, with the red extensions chosen to avoid length/angle/area coincidences with all previously constructed triangles.


          Twisted tiling
          The central $\triangle$ is slightly non-equilateral. All $\triangle$s incommensurate.
It seems clear that this approach could work, although it might not be straightforward to formalize to guarantee incommensurate triangles. Which brings me to my question:

Q. What is a scheme that details a lattice tiling—all vertices at points of $\mathbb{Z}^2$—composed of pairwise incommensurate triangles?

This requires a more explicit design that effectively describes the triangle corner coordinates in a way that makes it evident that no lengths/angles/areas are duplicated. Without such a clear description, it is not even immediately evident (to me) that it is possible.

The same question may be asked for incommensurate simplex tilings with vertices in $\mathbb{Z}^d$.


See also: Tiling the plane with incongruent isosceles triangles.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do four zigzags (one for each quadrant, (1,0) to (0,1) to (x,0) to (0,y) and so on), where if need be record all lengths involved, and choose the next x and y to leave room for lengths for the other zigzags. (You may need to divide areas or follow pattern 2 discretely, but a zigzag should work.) Busy packing, I'll let you fill in. Gerhard "Going Down Under, American Style" Paseman, 2018.07.29. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2018 at 22:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Gerhard, if I understand your description, you have two triangles sharing the edge joining $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$, so the triangles don't meet Joseph's definition of incommensurate. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2018 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ Right. Neither does Joseph's first method. However, with an outward triangular spiral, there is still a chance. Gerhard "Maybe One Guess Will Work" Paseman, 2018.07.29. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2018 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ Why does "displacing corners" lead to incommensurate tilings? Based on the picture, it appears that every edge is shared by two triangles, so... $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 29, 2018 at 23:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JoelDavidHamkins: Finally fixed the coloring when this was bumped to the front page. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 12, 2019 at 19:31

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Edit: This is a solution for non-commensurate side lengths only. The question also asks for non-commensurate angles, which this example does not provide.

I follow your approach. I start with a triangle with points in $\mathbb{Z}^2$ and add three incommensurate triangles, which leads to a new large triangle that is congruent to the first one and has points in $\mathbb{Z}^2$. We can repeat this process to tile the plane.

The first points are $A(0,0), B(2,0), C(2,1)$ as in the following image.

enter image description here

We now add three new points $A'(-4,0), B'(2,-14), C'(24,12)$ on the rays. We note:

(1) All new side lengths are strictly larger than the side lengths of the triangle $A,B,C$.

(2) All new side lengths are distinct (exercise).

(3) The new triangle $\Delta C'A'B'$ is congruent to $\Delta ABC$, in fact there is a right angle at $A'$ and the side $A'C'$ is double as large than $A'B'$.

The new arrangement of the four triangles is incommensurate by (1) and (2).

We can now repeat this process. Since (3) holds, we can use the congruency from $\Delta ABC$ to $\Delta A'B'C'$ to get the next larger triangle. By (1), all new lengths are larger than all old lengths and the new lengths are also distinct by (2). Moreover all points lie on $\mathbb{Z}^2$.

We can fill up all of $\mathbb{R}^2$ with incommensurate triangles.

Interesting follow up questions:

  • Is there a tiling in which the size of the triangles is bounded?
  • How fast do the lengths grow?
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I had intended that triangles "do not share ... a vertex angle," whereas yours do share angles...? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 18:28
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. Sorry. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 20:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .