3
$\begingroup$

We know that each ultrafilter $p$ on $\mathbb{N}$ can be identified with a finitely additive $\{0,1\}$-valued probablity measure $\mu_{p}$ on the power set of $\mathbb{N}$.

Now my question is which conditions should be added to a topological space $(X,T)$ to provide a situation for it's Stone-Chech compactification to identify each ultrafilter $p$ on $X$ with a measure $\mu_{p}$ on the power set of $X$ (or the sigma-algebra of Borel subsets of $X$)?!

Also it's possible for this measure to has some properties.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Needs more explanation. Does the definition of "ultrafilter" on a topological space have something to do with the topology? There is a measure characterization of realcompact spaces that may (or may not) be what you want here. $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Jul 26 '18 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar I have encountered with this question in reading of Vitaly Bergelson survey on Ergodic Ramsey theory during the process of defining Stone-Cech compactification. Where can i find what you said at the end of your comment?! $\endgroup$ – mahdi meisami Jul 26 '18 at 15:34
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ This great book that every student of analysis should read ... L. Gillman & M. Jerison, Rings of Continuous Functions $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Jul 26 '18 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar Thanks for your suggestion $\endgroup$ – mahdi meisami Jul 26 '18 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar what will be happen if we change to this: which conditions on Ston-Chech compatification of $X$ achieved from ultrafilter.? $\endgroup$ – mahdi meisami Jul 26 '18 at 16:46

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.