5
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a finite dimensional $K(\pi,1)$ manifold. Recall that the space of unbased null-homotopic loops $L_0(X)$ is the space of contractible continuous maps $S^{1}\to X$. There is an obvious $S^1$-action on $L_0(X)$.

Is it true that the quotient $L_0(X)/S^1$ is homotopy equivalent to $X$? Moreover, is there is a deformation retraction from $L_0(X)/S^1$ to the space of constant loops in it? What if $X$ is a finite dimensional $CW$-complex?

I think I can prove this statement in the case when $X$ is a smooth compact negatively curved manifold and we consider smooth maps from $S^1$ it. (I believe smoothness should not be essential.)

This is the follow up of The space of contractible loops of a finite dimensional $K(\pi,1)$

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean null-homotopic instead of contractible? The word contractible is usually kept for spaces with the same homotopy type as a point. Also, spaces are not homotopic but homotopy equivalent. $\endgroup$ Apr 2, 2018 at 21:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Fernando I see "contractible loop" with some frequency meaning null-homotopic loop, implicitly "contractible in M". $\endgroup$
    – mme
    Apr 2, 2018 at 21:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I use homotopic as a shorthand for homotopy equivalent. While it's certainly casual (and probably better to avoid in an MO question), I think it's pretty common since I've never had anyone not understand what I meant by it. I'm pretty sure I've heard other people use it, including some senior mathematicians. $\endgroup$
    – Joe Berner
    Apr 2, 2018 at 22:13
  • $\begingroup$ OK, maybe I'm too purist. $\endgroup$ Apr 2, 2018 at 22:24

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

THIS ANSWER IS WRONG (in that it claims the result in excess generality)

Suppose that $X$ is a $K(\pi,1)$ and a CW complex. Let $E$ be a universal covering space of $X$, so that $E$ is contractible and there is a free $\pi$-action on $E$ with orbit space $E/\pi\cong X$. (I really mean free and properly discontinuous -- what Hatcher's book calls a "covering space action".)

This gives $L(E)$ a $\pi$-action, again free, with orbit space $L(E)/\pi\cong L_0X$. And $L(E)$ has also $S^1$ acting, commuting with the $\pi$-action, in such a way that $$ (L(E)/S^1)/\pi=L(E)/(S^1\times\pi)=(L(E)/\pi)/S^1\cong L_0(X)/S^1. $$ On the other hand, a deformation retraction of $E$ to a point $p$ yields an $S^1$-equivariant deformation retraction of $L(E)$ to $L(p)$ (i.e. one that is compatible with the $S^1$-action), and this in turn yields a deformation retraction of $L(E)/S^1$ to $L(p)/S^1$.

So $L(E)/S^1$ is contractible and has a free action of $\pi$ with orbit space $L_0(X)/S^1$. This implies that $L_0(X)/S^1$ is a $K(\pi,1)$.

THE ERROR in the answer as written is in the assertion that the action of $\pi$ on $L(E)/S^1$ is free. But if we add the hypothesis that the group $\pi$ is torsionfree (which is true in the kinds of cases that the question is asking about) then this is all right: if $g\in\pi$ fixes the $S^1$-orbit of the loop $\gamma:S^1\to X$, then $g\circ \pi=\pi\circ R$ for some rotation $R:S^1\to S^1$; since the action of $\pi$ on $E$ is free (in the strong sense), this cannot happen unless $g$ and $R$ have (the same) finite order.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Can't spot the mistake...(but unaccept it by request ) $\endgroup$
    – aglearner
    Apr 3, 2018 at 0:37
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for explaining. I wonder then if indeed $X=\mathbb RP^{\infty}$ will give a counter example with torsion. One could take in $L_0(X)/S^1$ the subset corresponding to all lines in $\mathbb RP^{\infty}$ travelled twice. This is the grassmanian $G(2,\infty)$. Does not look like it can be "contracted" to $\mathbb RP^{\infty}$ ...? $\endgroup$
    – aglearner
    Apr 3, 2018 at 8:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. You can see explicitly that the "constant loops" map $X\to L_0(X)/S^1$ induces the trivial map in $\pi_1$ if $X$ is $\mathbb RP^\infty$ (or even $\mathbb RP^2$). $\endgroup$ Apr 3, 2018 at 14:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.