20
$\begingroup$

Let $M$ be an $n$-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold without boundary and $B(r)$ a geodesic ball of radius $r$. Then for $u\in W^{1,p}(B(r))$, the Poincare and Sobolev–Poincaré inequalities are satisfied $$ \int_{B(r)} |u-u_{B(r)}|^p\leq Cr\int_{B(r)} |\nabla u|^p $$ and $$ \left(\int_{B(r)}|u-u_{B(r)}|^{\frac{np}{n-p}}\right)^{\frac{n-p}{np}} \leq C \left(\int_{B(r)}|\nabla u|^{p}\right)^{\frac{1}{p}} \quad \text{if $1\leq p<n$.} $$ This result is well known. It is easy to prove if $r$ is small, because, then $B(r)$ is contained in a local coordinate system and we can deduce the result from the Euclidean one. However, for large $r$, the geometry of a ball can be very complicated — the ball may have nasty self intersections. The only argument I can think of is to use the fact that geodesic balls are so called John domains and then one can use arguments that are typical in analysis on metric spaces, like e.g. the proof of Theorem 9.7 in this paper. That is pretty unsatisfactory and not accessible to those who are not in the field of John domains or analysis on metric spaces. Thus my questions is:

Is there a good reference for elementary and self-contained proofs of the inequalities listed above?

I believe such a reference would be very useful for the mathematical community. For a related post see here.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For any $r$. If $r\ge {\rm diam}\, M$, then $B(r)=M$ and the inequality is still true. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 26, 2018 at 12:53
  • $\begingroup$ Could you give a reference to show the second local estimate, please ? $\endgroup$
    – DLIN
    Commented Jan 16, 2019 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ I know this is an old question, but... any news on the matter? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25 at 6:24
  • $\begingroup$ @GonzaloA.Benavides Thank you. I will look at it when I have time. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25 at 19:10

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Nonlinear Analysis on Manifolds: Sobolev Spaces and Inequalities, by E. Hebey is probably what you need.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hebey indeed discusses inequalities on balls under the assumption of the lower bound for the Ricci curvature and he refers to the work of Buser and Maheux & Saloff-Coste. This is a very difficult argument and therefore not satisfactory. The approach mentioned in my question is much more direct, but I am not sure if it is written explicitly in any source except papers on analysis on metric spaces. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2018 at 18:13
0
$\begingroup$

Is Theorem 2.12 of Dziuk and Elliott - Finite element methods for surface PDEs perhaps what you are looking for? See also, Lemma 2 in Bonito, Demlow, and Nochetto - Finite element methods for the Laplace–Beltrami operator.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry, but your answer has very little to do with my question. The problem is that in my question you don't have any regularity of the ball has a large radius. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I may be misunderstanding your question. In the references I provided they proved the result but for the integrals in the whole domain $M$, which is $C^2$ and without boundary. You would like a similar estimate now for balls within $M$, that of course may have a boundary; am I correct? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ That is correct. It may have boundary and it the ball is large it may be complicated with a lot of self intersections. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 27 at 22:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .