I'm currently reading "Revisiting the categorical interpretation of dependent type theory" and they give a very terse description of the Giraud-Benabou construction:
For a fibration $p : \mathbb E \to \mathbb B $, the fibration $Rp : R\mathbb E \to \mathbb B$ is defined by
- Obj $R\mathbb E$ is the set of pairs $(X,\phi)$ where $X \in \mathbb B$ and $\phi : \mathrm{dom}_X \to p$ is a morphism of fibrations from the restriction of the domain fibration to the slice categories $\mathrm{dom}_X: \mathbb B / X \to \mathbb B$. $Rp$ is the first projection.
- $\mathrm{Hom}((X, \phi),(Y, \psi))$ consists of pairs $(t,\mu)$ where $t : X \to Y$ and $\mu : \phi \to \psi \circ \mathrm{dom}_t$ over $\mathbb B$.
They then prove that this is a split fibration in a single line ("for $t:X \to Y$, set $\phi [t] = \phi \circ \mathrm{dom}_X$, ie. $\phi[t](s) = \phi(t \circ s)$ for all $s:Z \to X$, and $t_\phi = (t,id)$. Moreover, $Rp$ is split by the associativity of composition in $\mathbb B$"), and it isn't clear to me exactly what the relation between $Rp$ and $p$ is.
Questions:
- Is there a slightly less terse reference for this that isn't buried somewhere in an almost 500 page book on non-abelian cohomology written in French?
- What exactly is the relation between $Rp$ and $p$?
- What's the intuition behind this construction? If I were trying to create a split fibration from a fibration, why might I think to do this?
- What does this do to the codomain fibration over Set? Does this have a simple description?