11
$\begingroup$

One of the fundamental facts in fiber bundle theory is the following result for existence and extension of sections (see Thm. 9 in this paper of Palais, and compare with Thm. 12.2 in Steenrod's book):

Theorem: Let $\pi\colon E\to B$ be a locally trivial fiber bundle with fiber $F$ a contractible metrizable manifold, and base space $B$ a metrizable space. Let $A$ be a closed subspace of $B$ and $\sigma\colon A \to E$ be a continuous section of $E$ over $A$. There is then a continuous extension of $\sigma$ to a global section of $E$.

I would like to know if the above result has some equivariant version, for instance something along the following lines:

Question: Let $\pi\colon E\to B$ be a locally trivial fiber bundle with fiber $F$ a contractible metrizable manifold, and base space $B$ a metrizable $G$-space. Suppose also that $E$ is a $G$-space and $\pi$ is equivariant. Let $A$ be a closed $G$-invariant subspace of $B$ and $\sigma\colon A \to E$ be a continuous $G$-equivariant section of $E$ over $A$. Does there exist a continuous extension of $\sigma$ to a global $G$-equivariant section of $E$?

If the answer in general is no, then what are some additional conditions which would ensure the existence of an equivariant section?

Addendum: If the global section $\sigma$ exists, then for each $b\in B$, we must have $ \sigma(b)\in F_b^{G_{F_b}}, $ where $F_b:=\pi^{-1}(b)$ is the fiber over $b$, $G_{F_b}$ is the subgroup of $G$ mapping $F_b$ to itself, and $F_b^{G_{F_b}}$ is the set of points in $F_b$ fixed by $G_{F_b}$. So a necessary condition for the existence of $\sigma$ would be $$ F_b^{G_{F_b}}\neq\emptyset $$ for all $b\in B$. Further, it would be reasonable to assume that $F_b^{G_{F_b}}$ is contractible in parallel to the above theorem; or, to simplify things even further, assume that $F^H$ is contractible for all subgroups $H$ of $G$. Would this condition be enough to ensure the existence of $\sigma$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Haven't thought through the details, but usually when you want to turn an existence theorem into an equivariant existence theorem you try to average the $G$ - translates of the thing guaranteed by the existence theorem (in this case, the extension of the section). In the problem at hand I would guess that you'll either need some sort of local finiteness assumption for the group action, or maybe the existence of an invariant Haar measure (automatic if $G$ is compact). $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 20:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Averaging over $G$, i.e., using $\int_G g.\sigma(g^{-1}.x)\,dg$ (where $\sigma$ is a continuous extension) needs also a way to integrate, so you need a vector bundle, besides a Haar measure. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 20:50

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

For the trivial bundle case see chapter 3 of Feragen's thesis, and references therein. Going from a local section to a global one is facilitated by Proposition 2.3 in [Lashof, Equivariant bundles, Illinois J. Math. 26 (1982), no. 2, 257-271] available here.

I gather the above is known to the OP, so this is mainly for the benefit of others. I am not sure what more can be said in this generality.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .