5
$\begingroup$

What is an example of a scheme $X$ for which there does not exist any morphism $f : Y \to X$ which is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation and where $\operatorname{Pic} Y = 0$?

Remark: If I remove the "finitely presented" condition, then we can take $Y = \coprod_{x \in X} \operatorname{Spec} \mathcal{O}_{X,x}$.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The simplest such example is where $X$ is a smooth quasi-projective curve over an algebraically closed field $k$ such that the projective model of $X$ has genus $g>0$. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Oct 1 '17 at 21:04
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr Could you give some details of the argument that no such fppf cover $f : Y \to X$ exists? Say I take $X$ to be an elliptic curve over $k$. $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 2 '17 at 0:44
  • $\begingroup$ If $X$ has genus $\geq 1$, then for every fppf cover, every connected component $Y_i$ of $Y$ is a smooth, quasi-projective curve of genus $\geq 1$. In other words, it is a dense open subscheme of a smooth projective curve $\overline{Y}_i$ of genus $\geq 1$. The Picard group of such a curve is infinitely generated; in fact, the kernel of the degree homomorphism is infinitely generated. The complement of $Y_i$ in $\overline{Y}_i$ is generated by finitely many points. Thus, $\text{Pic}(Y_i)$ is the quotient of an infinitely generated group by a finitely generated group. So it is nonzero. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Oct 2 '17 at 1:08
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr Thanks. If I understand correctly, in your comment the fppf cover $f$ is assumed to be an etale morphism. Can there be no such $f$ which is finite flat but ramified, or smooth of relative dimension $\ge 1$? $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 2 '17 at 1:51
  • $\begingroup$ The morphism does not have to be etale, but I am assuming that it is finite. However, that is irrelevant as an argument. I will write more details in an answer below. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Oct 2 '17 at 8:25
13
$\begingroup$

Edit. I decided to add a little more explanation to make the result "sharp". For a smooth, projective scheme $X$ over an algebraically closed field $k$, for every finitely presented, flat, dominant morphism $p:Y\to X$, the kernel of the pullback homomorphism, $$ p^*:\text{Pic}(X)\to \text{Pic}(Y), $$ is a finitely generated subgroup. This result is "sharp" in the sense that every finitely generated subgroup is of the form $\text{Ker}(p^*)$ for a smooth, surjective morphism $p$. One step in finite generatedness of $\text{Ker}(p^*)$ is finite generatedness of the quotient group, $\text{Pic}(X)/\text{Pic}^0(X)$. The result, the "Theorem of the Base" of Lang and Néron, is quite involved, whereas the consequence to the OP's question follows already from finite generatedness of the intersection $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ of $\text{Ker}(p^*)$ and the subgroup $\text{Pic}^0(X)$. This is much easier.

To prove that $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is finitely generated, the main reduction is the proposition that every fppf cover of a quasi-compact scheme is "refined" by an fppf cover that is quasi-finite. This is a Bertini hyperplane theorem that holds for arbitrary Noetherian schemes, not just smooth, projective $k$-schemes. Thus, let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme, and let $p:Y\to X$ be a flat, finitely presented morphism.

Proposition 1. There exists a morphism $i:Z\to Y$ that is a disjoint union of locally closed immersions such that the composition $q=p\circ i$ is flat, quasi-finite, and has image equal to the image of $p$.

Proof. Since $p$ is flat and finitely presented, the image of $p$ is open. Up to replacing $X$ by the open image of $p$, assume that $p$ is surjective. Edit. Also, since $X$ is quasi-compact, it has a finite cover by open affines, $X_\beta$. For every collection $i_\beta:Z_\beta \to Y\times_X X_\beta$ as in the proposition, for the disjoint union $Z=\sqcup_\beta Z_\beta$ and for the unique morphism $i:Z\to Y$ whose restriction to each $Z_\beta$ equals $i_\beta$, also $i:Z\to Y$ satisfies the conditions in the proposition. Thus, it suffices to prove the result when $X$ is affine.

The argument is essentially a Bertini hyperplane argument. First of all, up to replacing $Y$ by a disjoint union of open affine subschemes, assume that $Y$ is affine. Denote by $Y_{\text{equi}}\subset Y$ the maximal open subset on which $p$ is (locally) equidimensional, i.e., at every point of every fiber of $p$, the irreducible components of the fiber containing the point all have equal dimensions. Edit. This open subset contains the open complement $U$ of the closed union $C$ of the finitely many intersections $Y_i\cap Y_j$ of irreducible components $Y_i$ and $Y_j$ of $Y$ such that the (constant) relative dimensions of $Y_i$ and $Y_j$ over $X$ are not equal. For every point $x\in X$, there exists an irreducible component $Y_i$ such that the fiber $(Y_i)_x$ has maximal dimension. Since $p$ is flat, $U\cap (Y_i)_x$ is dense in $(Y_i)_x$: if $(Y_j)_x\cap (Y_i)_x$ is nonempty, and if $\text{dim}(Y_j)_x\neq\text{dim}(Y_i)_x$, then $(Y_j)_x$ has smaller relative dimension, so $(Y_i)_x\cap (Y_j)_x$ is nowhere dense in $(Y_i)_x$.

Thus, the restriction of $p$ to $Y_{\text{equi}}$ is still surjective. Thus, without loss of generality, assume that $p$ is (locally) equidimensional. Then on every connected component $Y_\alpha$ of $Y$, the fiber dimension of $p$ is constant. We construct $Z$ as a disjoint union of schemes $Z_\alpha$ where $i_\alpha:Z_\alpha\to Y_\alpha$ is a disjoint union of locally closed immersions such that $p_\alpha\circ i_\alpha$ is a quasi-finite, flat morphism with image equal to the image of $p_\alpha$.

Thus, without loss of generality, assume that $Y$ is equidimensional of dimension $d$. The proof of the existence of $i:Z\to Y$ as above is by induction on $d$. If $d$ equals $0$, then define $Z$ to equal $Y$. Thus, by way of induction, assume that $d>0$ and assume the result is proved for $d-1$.

Let $e:Y\hookrightarrow \mathbb{A}^n_X$ be a closed immersion of $X$-schemes. For every point in the image of $p$, $x:\text{Spec}\ k \to X,$ the fiber $Y_x=p^{-1}(x)$ has only finitely many associated points.
Edit. Since $Y_x$ has dimension $d>0$, there exist points $y\in Y$ that specialize to none of these finitely many associated points. By prime avoidance, there exists an element $t_x\in k[\mathbb{A}^n_k]=k[t_1,\dots,t_n]$ that is in the prime ideal of $y$ yet in none of the associated primes. For every linear polynomial $t_x$ in the coordinate ring $k[\mathbb{A}^n_k]=k[t_1,\dots,t_n]$ that vanishes at none of these finitely many associated points, Multiplication by $t_x$ is injective on $\mathcal{O}_{Y_x}$. Let $t\in\mathcal{O}_{X,x}[t_1,\dots,t_n]$ be an element mapping to $t_x$. Denote by $H \subseteq \mathbb{A}^{n}_{\mathcal{O}_{X,x}}$ the zero scheme of $t$.

By the local flatness criterion, the intersection $H\cap Y$ is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$, cf. Theorem 22.5, p. 176, "Commutative ring theory", H. Matsumura, Cambridge studies in mathematics, vol 8. By the usual arguments, there exists an open affine neighborhood $W \subset X$ of $x$ such that $t$ lifts to a section $t_{W}$ of the structure sheaf of $\mathbb{A}^n_W$. Define $H_{W} \subset \mathbb{A}^{n}_{W}$ to be the zero scheme of $t_{W}$. By openness of the flat locus, etc., there exists an open subscheme $U$ of $Y$ containing $H\cap Y_x$ such that $H_{W}\cap U$ is flat over $X$. Choosing $t_x$ so that $H\cap Y_x$ is nonempty, $U\cap H_{W} \to X$ has image containing $p$, and it is equidimensional of dimension $d-1$ (this last by Krull's Hauptidealsatz).

Thus, by the induction hypothesis applied to $U\cap H_{W} \to X$, there exists a locally closed immersion $i_x:Z_x\to U\cap H_{W}$ such that $p\circ i_x$ is quasi-finite and flat with image $V_x$ containing $x$. As we vary $x$, the open images $V_x$ cover $X$. Since we assumed that $X$ is quasi-compact, finitely many of these opens suffice to cover $X$. Define $i:Z\to Y$ to be the disjoint union of these finitely many locally closed immersions $i_x$. Since the composition $p\circ i$ is quasi-finite and flat on each of the finitely many connected components, it is quasi-finite and flat. By construction, the image equals the image of $p$. Thus, the lemma is proved by induction on $d$. QED

Lemma 2. Let $q:Z\to X$ be a quasi-finite, flat morphism that is dominant. There exists a dense open subscheme $j:V\hookrightarrow X$ and a positive integer $n$ such that the kernel of the pullback homomorphism $q^*:\text{Pic}(X)\to \text{Pic}(Z)$ is contained in the kernel of the homomorphism $\text{Pic}(X)\xrightarrow{j^*}\text{Pic}(V)\xrightarrow{n\cdot -} \text{Pic}(V).$

Proof. For every finitely presented, quasi-finite morphism $q:Z\to X$, there exists a dense open subset $V\subset X$ such that $q^{-1}(V)\to V$ is finite. Since $q$ is dominant and flat, the morphism $q^{-1}(V)\to V$ is surjective, finite, and flat.

There exists a norm map, $$\text{Nm}_q : \text{Pic}(q^{-1}(V))\to \text{Pic}(V), \ \ \mathcal{L} \mapsto \text{det}(q_*\mathcal{L})\otimes \text{det}(q_*\mathcal{O})^{\vee}.$$ This is described in detail in Mumford's Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface. For every connected component $V_\alpha$ of $V$, the morphism $q$ has constant finite degree $m_{\alpha}$ over that component. For every invertible sheaf $\mathcal{M}_\alpha$ on $V_\alpha$, $\text{Nm}_q(q^*\mathcal{M}_\alpha)$ equals $\mathcal{M}_\alpha^{\otimes m_{\alpha}}$. Thus, defining $n$ to equal the least common multiple of these integers $m_{\alpha}$, for every invertible sheaf $\mathcal{M}$ on $V$, if $q^*\mathcal{M}$ is trivial, then also $\mathcal{M}^{\otimes n}$ is trivial. Thus, for an invertible sheaf $\mathcal{M}$ on $X$, if $q^*\mathcal{M}$ is trivial, then also $j^*\mathcal{M}^{\otimes n}$ is trivial. QED

Now let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth, projective $k$-scheme. The relative Picard functor $\text{Pic}_{X/k}$ is represented by a $k$-scheme whose connected components are projective. In particular, the identity component $\text{Pic}^0_{X/k}$ is an Abelian variety over $k$. The group of $k$-points, $\text{Pic}^0(X)$, is divisible and infinitely generated with finite $n$-torsion for every integer $n$.

For every finitely presented, flat, dominant morphism $p:Y\to X$, denote by $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ the kernel of the homomorphism, $$ \text{Pic}^0(X) \hookrightarrow \text{Pic}(X) \xrightarrow{p^*} \text{Pic}(Y). $$

Proposition 3. For every finitely presented, flat, dominant morphism $p:Y\to X$, the kernel $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is a finitely generated Abelian subgroup of $\text{Pic}^0(X)$.

Proof. By Proposition 1, there exists a morphism $i:Z\to Y$ such that $q=p\circ i:Z\to X$ is flat, quasi-finite, and dominant. The subgroup $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is contained in the subgroup $\text{Pic}^0_{X/k}[q]$. Thus, to prove that $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is finitely generated, it suffices to prove that $\text{Pic}^0(X)[q]$ is finitely generated.

By Lemma 2, there exists a dense open subset $j:V\hookrightarrow X$ and an integer $n$ such that the kernel of $q^*$ is contained in the kernel of $$\text{Pic}^0(X)\xrightarrow{j^*}\text{Pic}(V)\xrightarrow{n\cdot -}\text{Pic}(V).$$ The kernel $K$ of the restriction map $j^*:\text{Pic}(X)\to \text{Pic}(V)$ is generated by the finitely many irreducible components of $X\setminus V$ that have codimension $1$ in $X$. The intersection $K^0$ of $K$ with the subgroup $\text{Pic}^0(X)$ is a subgroup of the finitely generated group $K$, hence also $K^0$ is finitely generated. The quotient of $\text{Pic}^0(X)$ by $K^0$ still has finite $n$-torsion: since $\text{Pic}^0(X)$ is divisible, the inverse image $I$ in $\text{Pic}^0(X)$ of this $n$-torsion is an extension of $K^0$ by the $n$-torsion of $\text{Pic}^0(X)$. As both of these groups are finitely generated, also $I$ is finitely generated. Since $\text{Pic}^0(X)[q]$ is contained in the finitely generated group $I$, also $\text{Pic}^0(X)[q]$ is finitely generated. QED

Corollary 4. For $p:Y\to X$ as in the previous proposition, the kernel of $p^*:\text{Pic}(X)\to \text{Pic}(Y)$ is a finitely generated Abelian group.

Proof. The quotient of $\text{Ker}(p^*)$ by $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is a subgroup of the Néron-Severi group $\text{Pic}(X)/\text{Pic}^0(X)$. By the "Theorem of the Base" of Lang and Néron, the Néron-Severi group is finitely generated. Thus, the subgroup is also finitely generated. By the proposition, $\text{Pic}^0(X)[p]$ is finitely generated. Thus, the extension group $\text{Ker}(p^*)$ is also finitely generated. QED

As mentioned at the top, the result is sharp in the following sense.

Proposition 5. For every integral, normal, locally factorial Noetherian scheme $X$, for every finitely generated Abelian subgroup $K$ of $\text{Pic}(X)$, there exists a smooth, surjective morphism $p:Y\to X$ such that $p^*:\text{Pic}(X)\to \text{Pic}(Y)$ is surjective with kernel equal to $K$.

Proof. This is proved by induction on the minimum number of generators of $K$. If $K$ is zero, then define $p$ to be the identity morphism. Thus, by way of induction, assume that $K$ is nonzero, and assume that the result is proved whenever the number of generators is strictly smaller than the minimal number of generators of $K$.

Let $L$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$ whose class gives one of the generators in a minimal set of generators of $K$. Denote by $\overline{p}:\overline{Y}\to X$ the projective space bundle that admits a universal invertible quotient, $\overline{p}^*(\mathcal{O}_X \oplus L) \to \mathcal{O}(1)$. The two projections, $$a_1:\mathcal{O}_X\oplus L \to \mathcal{O}_X, \ \ a_2:\mathcal{O}_X\oplus L \to L,$$ are invertible quotients. These define sections of $\overline{p}$, $$s_1,s_2:X\to \overline{Y},$$ whose images, $D_1$, resp. $D_2$, are disjoint, integral Cartier divisors. Define $Y$ to be the open complement of $D_1\cup D_2$.

The pullback homomorphism and the class of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ define a splitting of Abelian groups, $$\text{Pic}(X)\oplus \mathbb{Z}[\mathcal{O}(1)] \xrightarrow{\cong} \text{Pic}(\overline{Y}).$$ Since $Y$ is the open complement of a union of two disjoint Cartier divisors, the usual open-closed exact sequence gives, $$\mathbb{Z}[\mathcal{O}(D_1)] \oplus \mathbb{Z}[\mathcal{O}(D_2)] \to \text{Pic}(\overline{Y}) \to \text{Pic}(Y) \to 0. $$ Combined with the splitting, $\text{Pic}(Y)$ is isomorphic to the quotient of $\text{Pic}(X)$ by the class of $\mathcal{O}(D_1-D_2)$, i.e., the class of $L$. Thus, $p^*$ is surjective and the kernel equals $\mathbb{Z}[L]$. By the induction hypothesis, there exists a further smooth, surjective homomorphism to $Y$ such that the pullback map is surjective with kernel equal to $K/\mathbb{Z}[L]$. Thus, the result is proved by induction on the minimal number of generators of $K$. QED

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks very much for the extended answer. Can I ask some clarifying questions? (1) In Proposition 1, I guess we may assume that $X$ is also affine (by taking an affine open cover of the image of $p$ in the beginning), in order to get the closed immersion $e$? (2) In Proposition 1, why is $Y_{\text{equi}}$ nonempty? $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 7 '17 at 22:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (3) Regarding Proposition 1: I guess it doesn't matter for the counterexample to my question since we are working over an algebraically closed field, but wouldn't we need to know that the field $k$ in $x : \text{Spec}\ k \to X$ is infinite, in order to ensure that we can take $t_{x}$ to be linear? In any case, unless I am mistaken, it seems to me that the linearity of $t_{x}$ is not used in the proof. $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 7 '17 at 22:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (4) Regarding the use of Krull's Hauptidealsatz in Proposition 1: I guess the local flatness criterion gives us that multiplication by $t$ will be injective on $\mathcal{O}_{Y \times_{X} \operatorname{Spec} \mathcal{O}_{X,x}}$. Then since everything is Noetherian, we should be able to take $W$ small enough that the lift $t_{W}$ is also a nonzerodivisor on $\mathcal{O}_{Y \times_{X} W}$. $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 7 '17 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ @user2831784. Those are good points. I edited the answer (with "edit" in boldface preceding each edit) to address those points. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Oct 9 '17 at 12:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. In Proposition 1, in order to see that each irreducible component $Y_{i}$ of $Y$ has constant relative dimension over $X$, I guess we can use e.g. math.stanford.edu/~conrad/249BW17Page/handouts/fiberdim.pdf. $\endgroup$ – user2831784 Oct 15 '17 at 6:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.