I am working over $\mathbb{R}$ (though most of the story goes over any field). I am looking for linear spaces of matrices such that the restriction of the determinant to this spaces can be written (non-trivially) as the power of another polynomial. Let me give some examples where such a phenomenon appears, before asking my question in more details.

  • let $n = 2m$ be an even integer. Then, the restriction of the determinant to $\bigwedge^2 \mathbb{R}^n \subset \mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ can be written as the square of a non-zero polynomial : the pfaffian.

  • let $n = 2m$ be again even. Let $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{C})$ be the set of $m \times m$ Hermitian matrices with complex coefficients. Using the matrix representation of $i$ (square root of $-1$) as: $$ i = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix},$$ one can embed $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{C})$ as a sub-algebra of $\mathrm{S}^{2} \mathbb{R}^{n} \subset \mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$. Then, it is easily checked that the following equality holds on $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{C})$:

$$ \mathrm{det}_{\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n})} = \left( \mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{C})} \right)^2.$$

  • let $n = 4m$. Let $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{H})$ be the set of $m \times m$ Hermitian matrices with quaternionic coefficients. Using the $4 \times 4$ matrix representation of $i,j,k$ (square roots of $-1$ in $\mathbb{H}$), One can embed $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{C})$ as a sub-algebra of $\mathrm{S}^{2} \mathbb{R}^{n} \subset \mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$. Then, it is again easily checked that the following equality holds on $\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{H})$:

$$ \mathrm{det}_{\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{n})} = \left( \mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{m}(\mathbb{H})} \right)^4.$$

Question : Is there a similar story for $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$?

More precisely, one can define a good notion of determinant for Hermitian $3 \times 3$ matrices with octonionic coefficients. I was wondering if there is an embedding $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O}) \hookrightarrow \mathrm{S}^{2} \mathbb{R}^{24} \subset \mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})$, such that the following hold on $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$:

$$ \mathrm{det}_{\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})} = \left( \mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})} \right)^8?$$

The algebra $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$ being non-associative, it can not be embedded as an algebra into a matrix algebra. On the other hand, what I am asking is (probably) considerably weaker : I just want an embedding of vector spaces $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O}) \hookrightarrow \mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})$ such that the restriction of $\mathrm{det}_{\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})}$ to $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$ is the $8$-th power of $\mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})}$.

Of course, since $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$ can not be embedded into $\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})$ as an algebra, it will probably be harder to check such an equality of determinants on $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$. Indeed, we can't use the representative of the Hermitian comatrix in $\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{24})$ and just multiply it with the orginal matrix to get $\mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})}.Id_{24}$. But I thought that it was perhaps possible to find another trick for $\mathcal{H}_{3}(\mathbb{O})$?

Thanks for your help.

  • $\begingroup$ Do you know anything about the $\mathcal{H}_{2}(\mathbb{O})$ case? $\endgroup$ – MTyson Aug 17 '17 at 22:37
  • $\begingroup$ @MTyson In the case of $\mathcal{H}_{2}(\mathbb{O})$ I think there is something going on. Let $\mathbb{O} \hookrightarrow \mathrm{S}^2 \mathbb{R}^8$ which associates to an octonion its multiplication table. This gives rise to an embedding $\mathcal{H}_{2}(\mathbb{O})$ in $\mathrm{S}^2 \mathbb{R}^{16}$. Using the block computation of a determinant for a $2*2$ block matrix (with the bottom right being a translation), one sees that $\mathrm{det}_{\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^{16})} = (\mathrm{det}_{\mathcal{H}_{2}(\mathbb{O})})^3$ $\endgroup$ – Libli Aug 17 '17 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ What is that first map? The multiplication table should be neither symmetric nor skew-symmetric. I see how given an $\mathbb{R}$-linear map $f:\mathbb{O}\hookrightarrow\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^8)$ satisfying $f(z)f(\bar z)=|z|^2I_8$ one could extend to $\mathcal{H}_2(\mathbb{O})$ with the right determinant relation. That would require 7 anticommuting matrices $e_1,\dots,e_7$ in $\mathrm{End}(\mathbb{R}^8)$ that square to $-I_8$. How are you building these out of the multiplication table? $\endgroup$ – MTyson Aug 18 '17 at 1:55
  • $\begingroup$ The first suggestion of embedding octonions into matrices is to map octonion $x$ to $8\times 8$ matrix $L_x$ or $R_x$ of left and right multiplication by octonion $x$. Similarly octonion matrix $2\times 2$ can be mapped to block matrix consisting of four blocks $L_{a_{i,j}}$ where $a_{i,j}$ is octonion in original matrix. Do we have formula for determinant of block matrix ? $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Aug 18 '17 at 9:32
  • $\begingroup$ See also mathoverflow.net/questions/239954/… $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Aug 18 '17 at 10:49

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.